Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> MINUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,September 10,2012 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (S. #10-3491 CITY OF ORONO-HARDCOVER REGULATIONS AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> dealt with legal nonconformities, some existing language from the City Code was eliminated as other <br /> recent code changes made that language unnecessary. <br /> Gozola staxed in order to address one of the questions that were posed at the last meeting,he compiled a <br /> map to help illustrate the impact of having Step 5 within the tier methodology. Gozola indicated this <br /> particular map provides a good visualization that Step 5 is not an unreasonable expansion of the <br /> regulations that are currently in place. By filling in the gaps, it creates new regulations on 102 parcels <br /> within the community but most, if not all of those parcels, are entirely surrounded or almost entirely <br /> surrounded by parcels that are already regulated. Almost half of those parcels that are being added are in <br /> the Navarre area. Since the beginning of these discussions,people have looked at that particular area of <br /> the city as being important to close those particular gaps since all of the water in Navarre is basically <br /> ending up in approximately the same area regardless of the distance from the lake. <br /> Rahn commented he is becoming more receptive to the tiers, and that if Staff is in favor of the tiers,he <br /> would also be in favor of them. Rahn stated in going back to the beginning of this process,his thought <br /> with going to a single percentage number on the smaller lakeshore lots was to figure out what the average <br /> hardcover number was and that he had the impression the number would be around 17 percent. Rahn <br /> noted by allowing 25 percent hazdcover on a 60-foot wide lakeshore and by including the 0-75 area in the <br /> hardcover,the property owner would be allowed over 1,100 squaxe feet of additional hardcover. On a <br /> 100-foot wide lot,the property owner would be allowed almost 1,900 square feet of additional hardcover. <br /> Rahn noted under the draft ordinance,the City is allowing quite a bit more hardcover,which was one of <br /> the reasons he was opposed to the tier system on the longer lots. <br /> Rahn stated based on the large amount of additional hardcover that would be allowed,he is hesitant to <br /> allow the additional 100 square feet of patio or deck. Rahn stated his understanding also was that the City <br /> was going to include retaining walls as hardcover. Rahn noted by just including the 0-75 foot zone,the <br /> City is allowing a lot more hardcover on each lot,and questioned whether the City needs to do the 100 <br /> square feet of deck and/or pervious surface. Rahn suggested the City try the new regulations without the <br /> 100 square feet allowance and that it can always be added later if the City Council thinks it is necessary. <br /> Printup stated his thought on the items that were considered "low hanging fruit" such as the decks was <br /> that they should be allowed and not considered hardcover. Printup indicated he is in favor of the retaining <br /> walls and decks not being considered hardcover and that citizens frequently question why they should be <br /> considered hardcover when the water goes through or around them. <br /> Printup stated he does understa.nd what Council Member Rahn is saying about inclusion of the 0-75 foot <br /> zone allowing additional hardcover,but that he is still in support of allowing the 100 square feet of deck. <br /> Printup indicated he does not want to see more stringent rules placed on the small lots in Orono. <br /> Franchot stated the process has been a good one and that he is a believer in pervious and permeable <br /> hardcover. The difficulty with where the City Council ended up is that there are so many different lots <br /> but that in his opinion they have reached the best compromise. Franchot stated he also believes it is better <br /> to simplify the regulations and not have people figure out which part of their lot is allowed what <br /> percentage of hardcover. <br /> Franchot stated the current regulations on the 0-75 foot zone help protect the lakeshore and that he is <br /> comforta.ble with the ordinance. Franchot stated there will likely be instances where there are issues but <br /> Page 6 of 26 <br />