Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, August 13, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(5. #10-3491 CITY OF ORONO -HARDCOVER REGULATIONS AMENDMENT, Continued) <br />Bremer asked whether the City Council would still like Planner Gaffron to compare the three different <br />scenarios. <br />Gaffron asked whether the Council would like to go with 25 or 30 percent on the long, deep lakeshore <br />lots. Gaffron noted simply going with 25 percent would create a new zone. Gaffron stated if the City <br />Council would like Staff to analyze all three different scenarios, they might not be able to get it all done <br />in two weeks. <br />Rahn recommended the City Council not rush through this process given the complexity of the issues. <br />Rahn stated it is likely the City will need to make some minor changes to the ordinance in the future but <br />that the Council should take sufficient time now to get it as close to what we want it to be. <br />Mayor McMillan reopened the public hearing at 8:22 p.m. <br />Melissa Musgjerd stated they have recently found a residence in Orono they would like to purchase and <br />that every realtor they have talked to has attempted to convince them not to purchase in Orono given this <br />issue. Musgjerd stated prior to them, four other couples backed out because they did not want to go <br />through the variance process and/or wait for the City Council to act on this ordinance. Musgjerd <br />indicated they will likely be going through the variance process but that this issue is being talked about <br />quite a bit in other communities. There is a lot of negativity towards it to the point where people are <br />saying that you do not want to live in the City of Orono due to these issues. <br />McMillan noted the City of Orono is one of the more restrictive cities on hardcover and that it is the <br />desire of the City to make it easier for residents to construct something on the lake. The variance process <br />will still be in place even if the new ordinance is adopted and there will be uniquely shaped lots that will <br />require variances. <br />Carol Stanberg, 660 Tonkawa, stated when you look at the map, a natural reaction is to say that the red <br />zone is the most restrictive and that there is some inequity. Stanberg stated if you are going to eliminate <br />the tiers, feet would be much more equitable, people with deeper lots would not be penalized, and there <br />would be more flexibility. <br />Rahn commented distance allows more uniformity. Rahn stated the zone system is the way the City <br />currently calculates hardcover and that the City should not make significant changes just to change. Rahn <br />stated in his view the City has made some good changes such as allowing landscape fabric and small <br />decks. <br />Printup moved, Bremer seconded, to table Application #10-3491, City of Orono - Hardcover <br />Regulations Amendment, to the September 10, 2012, City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*6. #12-3564 MARTIN WOODY ARCHITECTS ON BEHALF OF DAVE SCOTT, 1905 <br />HERITAGE DRIVE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 6159 <br />Bremer moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6159, a Resolution Granting a <br />Variance to Orono Municipal Code Section 78-305, for the property located at 1905 Heritage Drive. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Page 13 of 19 <br />