Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,Apri115,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Landgraver noted this is not the finalized document but that he is somewhat hesitant on that item. <br /> Gaffron stated the Planning Commission has raised some good issues and that$taff will need to look at it <br /> further. <br /> Lemke indicated he would tend to lean towards Option B since it provides some further regulation. <br /> Schoenzeit stated Option B may apply to more of the freestanding structures, and that under Option B, <br /> you would need to adjust your list and make it two separate lists, such as features to the principal structure <br /> � and freestanding. <br /> Landgraver and Leskinen concurred that it would make sense to have two separate lists. <br /> Gaffron stated the features would fall under Option C and freestanding would fall under Option B. <br /> Section 21. This change merely adds"sport courts"to the list of oversize accessory structures that are <br /> subject to special setbacks(tennis courts,pools,paddocks, arenas). <br /> Section 22. A number of changes are made to Section 1405,Nonencroachments: <br /> 1405(1): "Mechanical devices" is removed(no longer appears in most cities' codes);"gutters" is <br /> added; "similar building elements"replaces"the like"to emphasize that these are parts of <br /> the principal building rather than free-standing fixtures. <br /> Gaffron stated there is a list of items that are common features of a house, such as chimneys, flues, <br /> meters, etc. The City has added gutters and other similar building elements to say that these are parts of <br /> the building and not something separate. Name plate signs and other signage are subject to the provisions <br /> of a different section of the code. Terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or other similar structures <br /> which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building are already in the <br /> code. <br /> Schoenzeit asked what the ground floor level would be. <br /> Gaffron stated Staff has considered that to be the lowest floor but there is not a definition in the code as <br /> to what it specifically is. The ground floor is the level you can walk out but it is not necessarily a <br /> walkout. - <br /> Schoenzeit stated the other piece in the previous discussion was if it was below the neighboring property. <br /> Gaffron noted that has not been addressed in this section. The Planning Commission had talked about <br /> window wells which do not extend more than five feet from the building and other items such as <br /> driveways and sidewalks. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the language,not to extend above the height of the ground floor of the principal <br /> building was one item discussed by the Planning Commission previously, and the other one that was <br /> discussed was when you are below the neighbor's property, such as a retaining wall,or there is a large <br /> differential between the two,you can have a terrace at the base of it,and if you are above it,you could put <br /> a wall on your side. <br /> Page 22 of 26 <br />