Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,February 19,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> It is important to note that here should be a platted corridor to the properiy to the immediate southeast for <br /> potential future road connection to serve that property. This would allow for a future through road from <br /> Willow to Watertown. This would provide more options for future development of the property to the <br /> southeast and ultimately make for more efficient road maintenance. <br /> A Rural Oasis Study and Conservation Design Master plan is required for this project and it should be <br /> submitted with the preliminary plat application. <br /> Any platting that takes place would require the recording of easements and buffers for the wetland. The <br /> property is subject to the standard perimeter, drainage and utility easements around all property <br /> boundaries in the plat as well as Conservation and Flowage Easements over the delineated wetlands and <br /> wetland buffers. Conservation easements should be provided to protect the views and natural features <br /> identified with the comprehensive Conservation Design Master planning process. <br /> The subject properiy is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Sewer service is available to <br /> these properties via the Hackberry system which discharges to the Long Lake system. Water service is <br /> available from the Long Lake system subject to Long Lake approval. Sewer and water fees will be due to <br /> Long Lake, subject to the provisions of the Glendale Cove Sewer and Water Agreement. <br /> The developer will be responsible for installation of sewer and water laterals to serve the development. <br /> Per past City practice,there will not be a connection charge to Orono for sewer or water but Long Lake <br /> connection charges will apply. <br /> Staff has developed a series of sketches depicting options for consideration. Sketch 1 puts a slight curve <br /> in the entry from Willow and also includes a future 50-foot angled corridor from the cul-de-sac to the <br /> northwest corner of the property to the southeast. This layout also reduces the length of the outlot <br /> driveway to Lot 3 to around 100 feet. <br /> Gaffron stated Sketch 2 avoids platting a permanent cul-de-sac and makes use of temporary cul-de-sac <br /> easements. This type of layout has been used on occasion in the past. The benefit is that if/when the road <br /> is extended to serve the next property,the temporary cul-de-sac can be physically removed and the <br /> underlying land can revert back to the appropriate owners via extinguishing the easement rather than <br /> vacating a platted road. This option also saves on future survey costs. <br /> Both Sketches 1 and 2 end up putting a corridor connection to the next property right at the northwest <br /> corner of the parcel,which may be awkward and may not be a reasonable place to connect into that <br /> property since you will end up with either a right angle turn or some triangular shaped lots. <br /> Sketch 3 shows the cul-de-sac further to the east and north and rearranges the layout so that Lots 1 and 2 <br /> become single lots and would access directly to the cul-de-sac. Lots 2 and 3 would also access directly to <br /> the cul-de-sac. Lots 4 and 6 would access directly on to the private road but instead of having a <br /> connection at the very northwest corner of the neighboring property, it would be moved it south either to <br /> the very south end of Lot 5 or between Lot 5 and 4 and 6. <br /> Gaffron stated conceptually this is an idea that could work. The potential is that you create the corridor <br /> between Lots 5 and 6 with the expectation that that lot is either going to access the driveway off of <br /> Willow Drive or the future road. It also forces there to be two new roads or connections off of Willow <br /> Drive. <br /> Page 16 of 23 <br />