Laserfiche WebLink
Accessory Uses and Structures <br /> April 11,2013 <br /> Page 3 <br /> - "Fencing" has been added, subject to the existing provisions contained in the non- <br /> encroachments section. <br /> - "Flagpoles" has been added, subject to the accessory structure location requirements of the <br /> zoning chapter, but not establishing extraordinary setbacks. Should we add `and height' <br /> after location? <br /> - "Compost structures and firewood piles" has been added. Should we add `subject to the <br /> accessory structure location requirements of this Chapter', since it may be perceived that <br /> a firewood pile is a use, not a structure...? <br /> - "Storage of recreational vehicles" has been added, subject to the existing listed code <br /> provisions. Ice fishing houses are listed as being a vehicle when on wheels and a structure <br /> when not on wheels, subject to either the pertinent vehicle storage or structure location <br /> standards. <br /> - "Garage sales" and the like have been added, limited to 2 sales per year of 4 days duration <br /> each; and sale of"personal or recreational vehicles and equipment" has been added, limited <br /> to 2 items per year and can't be parked in r-o-w, boulevard or front yard - must be in <br /> driveway. <br /> - "Laundry drying equipment" has been added - should we add "subject to the accessory <br /> structure location requirements of this chapter"? <br /> - "Solar electric and solar thermal systems' has been added, as has "Geothermal systems". We <br /> don't have any code standards in place for these systems as of yet - options are to adopt <br /> language similar to Medina's (See Table 3 from 3-18-13 packet) ar leave adoption of <br /> standards for future action... <br /> Sections 12 thru 19. In each of these districts (RPUD, B-1 thru B-6, and Industrial) the preamble <br /> sentence within the accessory use section has been modified to read identical to the single-family <br /> district wording, by stating that onlv the listed uses are permitted, provided they are subordinate <br /> to and associated with and located on the same lot as a permitted use. <br /> Section 20. This section dealing specifically with the height of structures is drafted with 4 <br /> options for consideration. The existing code is inconsistent within itsel£ Section 78-1366(a) <br /> says that the height limitations imposed by other provisions of this chapter may be increased by <br /> conditional use permit by 50 percent when applied to the list of structures. Section 78-1366(b) <br /> states that heights in excess of those allowed under subsection (a) of this section for the uses <br /> enumerated in that subsection may be permitted only by conditional use permit. <br /> This inconsistency was not always the case. The code section first appeared in 1968 and did not <br /> require a CUP far the first 50% increase - it was simply allowed. This changed in 1977 when <br /> three changes were made via Ordinance No. 198: "Antenna or antenna structure" was added to <br /> the list; "Silos and other typical farm structures" was deleted from the list; and the CUP <br /> requirement was added (antennas were removed in 1997 when a new section was added to each <br /> zoning district regarding "communication reception/transmission devices".) <br />