Laserfiche WebLink
I- Wetland Code Review <br /> February 26, 2013 <br /> ' . Page 2 <br /> 9. 78-1605.b.3: The first paragraph has multiple punctuation and grammatical errors that should be <br /> corrected. <br /> 10. 78-1605.c: Wetland buffer widths listed by the City differ from those required by MCWD. However, <br /> MCWD does not require an additional structure setback. <br /> 11. 78-1605.c: The phosphorus concentration limits for Preserve and Manage lwetland are in lbs/ac/yr and <br /> for Manage 2 and Manage 3 are in ppb. For consistency, should limits be listed using the same units? <br /> 12. 78-1605.g.1: Should City consider rewording as follows? "Maintain and repair damage to buffer areas <br /> from such activities as mowing, cutting, grading or other prohibited activities, unless mowing is <br /> �allowed by the city as��art of an a�proved buffer management plan". <br /> 13. 78-1608.1.e: Should the City indicate that requirement for minimum floor elevations applies to structures <br /> directly adjacent to wetland? <br /> 14. 78-1608.1.f: Should the City consider adding language regarding the requirement for a Maintenance <br /> Agreement for structures and ponds providing stormwater treatment? <br /> 15. 78-1612: Should buffer markers also be placed at changes of horizontal direction and lot corners along <br /> the upper edge of the buffer, in addition to the every 200' requirement? <br /> If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to discuss at (952) 448-8838.. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> BOLTON &MENK, INC. <br /> �8C a—�"G ue�-Ga� <br /> Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. <br /> Water Resources Engineer <br />