Laserfiche WebLink
#11-3501 YourBoatClub LLC ' ` <br /> April 7,2011 ' <br /> Page 3 <br /> Similar Past Requests . <br /> The only other boat club CUP issued by the City has been to Sailors World Marina in 1995. In <br /> that case, approval was granted for a 100-member maximum boat club use subject to maintaining <br /> the exclusive availability of 25 off-site parking stalls during May through September (subject to <br /> annual confirmation) with the City reserving the right to reconsider if parking issues or <br /> inadequacies arise at the marina or at the off-site parking location. That site had 75 slips <br /> requiring 45 parking stalls and only 41 available. Rather than granting a parking variance for the <br /> boat club, the City required off-street parking at a level that calculates out to 2.1 stalls per club <br /> boat(see Exhibit E). � , . <br /> Summary of Issues Discussed by Planning Commission <br /> Concurrently with this application by Your Boat Club, the Planning Commission is reviewing <br /> application #11-3500, a staff-driven proposed amendment of the B-2 Boat Club CUP standards. <br /> This concurrence is not coincidental; staff chose to bring forth the amendment for discussion in <br /> anticipation of the Your Boat Club application, in the hopes of esta.blishing clarity as to how the <br /> City will move forward given the apparently increasing public interest in a multiple-user concept <br /> of pleasure boating. <br /> #11-3500 B-2 Boat Club Standards Amendment. The Planning Commission in February began <br /> its first review of a staff-proposed amendrnent to the B-2 standards which would require that for <br /> each 5-persons capacity in boats stored in water or on land for boat club use, one complete <br /> parking stall shall be provided. This discussion is documented in the staff inemos and PC <br /> minutes attached as Exhibit D. To date, the amendment has been tabled twice, and its eventual <br /> outcome is uncertain. <br /> An issue raised by the Planning Commission during the initial February discussion was that the <br /> term "boat club" is not clearly defined in the code, but needs to be carefully defined given the <br /> variety of boating options available today. _Members questioned the need for parking standards <br /> for the boat club use, and asked staff to more clearly define the problem,to identify the objective <br /> the City would like to achieve, and to outline the options for achieving that objective. These <br /> topics were addressed in the subsequent staff inemo of 3-17-11. , <br /> As a result of further Planning Commission review in March, Planning Commission tabled the <br /> application again, suggesting that of the four administrative options presented by staff(see p. 4 <br /> of 3-17-11 memo: A - No change; B - Revise boat club conditional use standards; C - Interim <br /> Use Permit; or D - Make boat clubs an Accessory Use) they would like staff to pursue re- <br /> categorizing boat clubs as an Accessory Use rather than as a Conditional Use. Additionally, <br /> Planning Commission suggested that other allowable uses within the B-2 District should be <br /> considered in terms of their impacts on parking. Staff to date has not proceeded further on these <br /> recommendatioris. <br /> #11-3501 Your Boat Club CUP Application. Planning Commission reviewed this application at <br /> its March meeting. It is noteworthy that PC chose to reverse the agenda order, reviewing this <br /> � application before their second review of the B-2 Standards Amendment. Council is asked to <br />