My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-20-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
05-20-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2013 12:59:26 PM
Creation date
5/22/2013 12:54:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� L` c <br /> Summary <br /> The following tables provide a general summary of wetland delineation method selection: <br /> Delineation Review of Site Visit Sampling Approach Complete Field Staking � <br /> Method offsite mapping Field Data of Wetland <br /> resources Forms Boundaries <br /> Routine Level 1 Yes Sometimes Offsite No No <br /> Routine Level 2 Yes Yes Onsite,qualitative Yes Yes <br /> Comprehensive Yes Yes Onsite,quantitative Yes Yes <br /> WCA Application Type Examples Commonly Used Delineation Method <br /> Temporary impact under No-Loss Routine Level 1 <br /> Banking application: pre-application scoping Routine Level 1 <br /> Banking application:full application Routine Level 2 <br /> Road Program Wetland Impact Documentation—Road project Routine Level 1 <br /> through a large continuous wetland <br /> Road Program Wetland Impact Documentation—Scattered Routine Level 2 <br /> wetlands within construction corridor � � <br /> Replacement plan Routine Level 2 <br /> Enforcement actions Routine Level 2 or Comprehensive <br /> Wetland boundary approval(no project application) Routine Level 2 <br /> Agricultural exemption determination (8420.0420,Subpart 2A) Routine Level 1 <br /> In all cases, the selection of the appropriate delineation method and level should be coordinated <br /> between the applicant and the WCA local government unit or TEP. The need for a delineation, and <br /> the appropriate method/level, depends on the amount of specificity and documentation necessary to <br /> achieve the purpose of the project and make a decision on the activity or request in relation to WCA. <br /> Regardless of the method or level used, the delineation results should include a description of <br /> techniques, materials utilized, and a basis for the determination made. As with many aspects of the <br /> 87 Manual, common sense and good judgment is essential. <br /> � � � <br /> : . . <br /> The primary authors of this guidance are: <br /> . Ken Powell,Senior Wetland Specialist <br /> . Les Lemm,WCA Coordinator ' <br /> This document is available on the BWSR <br /> website and may be revised periodically. <br /> Check the website for the most current <br /> version. www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands <br /> Contact your Local Government Unit or BWSR <br /> Wetland Specialist for additional information. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.