Laserfiche WebLink
� t �. <br /> , <br /> Routine Level 3: Combination of levels 1 and 2. <br /> With the Routine Level 3 delineation, a portion of the site is delineated utilizing offsite methods while <br /> another portion is delineated utilizing onsite field data collection and the physical marking of <br /> boundaries. Level 3 could be used where exact boundaries are relevant for only�a portion of the site <br /> or project,while the remainder can be assessed using offsite resources. <br /> �< ��A°•,, ,�;, If�7 �.�-�,�� �, ::�� �-• - •� Routine Level 2 in the north <br /> . .�,.� .. � .I � � � �� � ° �� <br /> � half of the site,where the <br /> project(driveway and building <br /> '� site) is proposed. <br /> - <br /> 1, � S <br /> vh'tt� CS <br /> I ;i+s:R,.z <br /> l+i;, <br /> � Q! ri: i � <br /> ,' 7 1...� s+t�.' <br /> � <br /> M Routine Level 1 in the southern <br /> t portion of the site where no <br /> , + project is proposed, but the <br /> � �' landowner wants a preliminary <br /> �x"'�'-` identification of potential <br /> � wetland areas. <br /> ,�� <br /> ,�:. �� . ,,� ... - . , _� ;,. > , . .:.v� � � .. .,r <br /> Comprehensive Delineations <br /> The comprehensive delineation method should be used when the project area is very complex or <br /> when a determination requires rigorous documentation. When the comprehensive method is used, <br /> both the applicant and the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) should agree to the exact methodology <br /> prior to beginning the field work. Keep in mind that the comprehensive method can be used in <br /> combination with routine methods, depending on the parameter (vegetation, soils, hydrology) that <br /> requires greater documentation. <br /> Examples where the comprehensive method may be appropriate for WCA purposes: <br /> 1. The applicant and TEP disagree on a routine delineation and further data collection using the <br /> routine method cannot, or could not, resolve the dispute. This could be the case with a complex <br /> site where the selection of sampling point locations has a significant influence on the result. In <br /> such instances, the comprehensive method provides a systematic approach to sampling that <br /> should reduce bias. <br /> 2. The tlecision or project is, or is likely to be, challenged in court. This type of situation can <br /> sometimes require more rigorous data collection and documentation to support boundary <br /> locations and other conclusions. <br /> 5 <br />