Laserfiche WebLink
r. tS �, <br /> 3. A project that proposes to temporarily impact a wetland and then restore it back to its original <br /> condition in accordance with WCA No-Loss criteria. In many of these cases it is only necessary to <br /> determine that the project will in fact occur in a wetland, and the characteristics of the wetland <br /> that will need to be restored. It is not necessary to define exact boundaries of the wetland if they <br /> are clearly outside the project area. <br /> _ 1.�, ....�. .,w..,.:.,.��..,�..r�.:._... .� .e: �.... <br /> Temporary impacts from the <br /> repair of a pipeline through a <br /> . lar�e continuous wetland. <br /> � <br /> r <br /> , <br /> r, <br /> ,. <br /> ;` <br /> t> <br /> F' . <br /> F' <br /> � <br /> .... _r•.� .--�,... . F.. . ... -_ . . . . ..�„ ... .. ... .t.., ..... .,.,r,i: .� <br /> 4. Similar to example 3 above, a situation where a de minimis impact is proposed and the entire <br /> footprint of the project is less than the applicable de minimis amount. For example, a road <br /> crossing through a wetland may be proposed such that the actual footprint of the road is less <br /> than the applicable de minimis amount for that location. In this case, a determination on the <br /> applicability of the de minimis exemption can be made without knowing the exact wetland <br /> boundary. <br /> . .�,,...;.....��w:s��.w. .. ,..._.... ..;�,,,.... ...,�.���- r,N <br /> � Proposed access road with a 4,000 sq.ft. <br /> ; footprint,in an area with an applicable <br /> ' de minimis amount of 10,000 sq.ft. <br /> °t <br /> � <br /> « <br /> ;. <br /> e. <br /> ; <br /> � 3 <br />