Laserfiche WebLink
*� Jeff&Jill Pugh Public Hearing Memo,617107, Page 3 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> There are four fundamental issues that the Boartl should atldr��ss when considering the Pugh variance <br /> application. These include: <br /> 1, The applicants have provided adequate documentation �rhat shallow water exists at this site to grant a <br /> dock length variance. However, a question remains on ��uhat the reasonable dock length is for this <br /> site because of the potential impact that it might have or� the abutting properties. <br /> 2. In order to provide the applicants a DUA, either one or both of the extended side site lines needs to <br /> be adjusted, with the possibility of side setback relief. A question remains on whether the proposal to <br /> adjust only the easterly side site line extension makes sE;nse or whether it should be balanced <br /> between the two abutting properties. <br /> 3. In past adjusted DUA variances, the Board has frequent y granted setback and/or length relief for the <br /> abutting site(s) that are impacted. The Board should consider what types of relief you deem <br /> appropriate for the abutting site(s) if the Board is inclined to direct LMCD legal counsel to prepare <br /> Findings of Fact and Order to approve the Pugh variance application. <br /> 4. A question remains on the appropriate width of the DUA for this site, which docking and boat storage <br /> must be contained within. It seems reasonable to me that this should not exceed 11'. <br /> . - � <br />