My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
11-19-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2014 2:39:10 PM
Creation date
4/1/2013 4:01:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. ' � {;� <br /> 12-3580 <br /> " November 15,2012 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> The initial zoning of this area occurred on November 20, 1950 when the entire property became <br /> part of the "Forest Lake District" requiring 15,000 s.f. in area and 75' frontage in order to be <br /> buildable. Some time prior to 1959 the portion of Cherry Place bisecting this property was vacated. <br /> The 1967 Zoning Code (September 5, 1967) established four new residential zoning districts in <br /> Orono; at that time the boundary between the R-1C District (1 acre minimum) and the R-1D District <br /> (1/2 acre minimum) was established along the north boundary of Lot 11 east of the centerline of <br /> Cherry Avenue. <br /> Some time prior to 1975 (as evidenced by 1974 tax records in City files) the vacated roadway and <br /> the parcels either side of the roadway were combined to create one tax parcel that included Lot 11, <br /> Block 4 that was in the 1/2-acre zone and the remainder of the property in the 1-acre zone. That <br /> legal description of the boundary between zoning districts was continued with the 1975 rezoning <br /> that created the LR-16 and LR-1C districts that exist today. <br /> A small house is located on Lot 11, Block 4, the southerly half of the property. The potential exists ._ . <br /> for this small house to be the subject of a teardown/rebuild at some future date, and the shape of <br /> the lot suggests a new home would most likely straddle the zoning boundary. The zoning code in <br /> Section 78-163 addresses such a situation in this manner: <br /> "Where a district boundary line divides a lot of record which was in single ownership <br /> on January 1, 1975, and places a portion of such lot of record in two or more use <br /> districts, any portion of such lot within 50 feet either side of such a dividing district <br /> boundary line may be used for any use of either use district; however, if any portion of <br /> such lot shall extend beyond the 50-foot limitation, the district line as shown shall <br /> prevail." <br /> The problem with this parcel is that portions of the property are more than 50 feet either side of the <br /> zoning boundary,so that as currently zoned, 1/2-acre standards would apply to part of the lot and 1- <br /> � acre standards to the remainder. Staff believes this situation begs to be rectified by rezoning so the <br /> entire parcel is in one zoning district. <br /> Proposed Rezoning <br /> The property is 1.06 acres in area. There are 4 developed residential lots abutting the property, <br /> ranging in size from 0.51 acres to 0.65 acres, averaging 0.59 acres. In keeping with the character of <br /> the neighborhood, it is staff's recommendation that the portion of the property currently zoned LR- <br /> 1B be rezoned to LR-1C, 1/2-acre minimum, which is the least restrictive of the two options. Note <br /> that the primary difference between the LR-16 and LR-1C standards is the street setback and <br /> required width and area. A comparison of the district standards is shown in the following table: <br /> Lot Area Lot width Front yard Side yard adjacent Rear yard Side yard adjacent to <br /> to another lot street <br /> LR-16 1.0 acre 140' 35' 10' 30' 35' <br /> LR-1C 0.5 acre 100' 30' 10' 30' 15' <br /> It should be noted that the property if rezoned to LR-1C will not be subdividable to create a second <br /> lot, because it does not have nearly enough lot width to make two conforming lakeshore lots and <br /> does not have enough lot area to accomplish a front/back lot configuration. <br /> Staff Recommendation • <br /> Staff recommends that the property be rezoned such that the entire property is within the LR-1C <br /> Single Family Lakeshore Residential District. � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.