My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
02-19-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2013 3:31:01 PM
Creation date
4/1/2013 3:30:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• #13-3591 <br /> 11 February 2013 <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br /> signage should be purchased by the developer for installation along buffer areas and where the buffer <br /> intersects lot lines. <br /> Road Improvements and/or Easements Needed <br /> The City requires standard perimeter, drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries in <br /> the plat as well as Conservation and Flowage Easements over the delineated wetlands and wetland <br /> buffers. Conservation easements should be provided to protect the views and trees as indicated in the <br /> KES Conservation Design Report. � <br /> Stormwater and Drainage Improvements <br /> The development is subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee of$3,840 per acre x 13.72 total <br /> acres = $52,684.80. (Because none of the proposed lots exceed 4.0 gross acres, the 2013 Fee Schedule <br /> 2-acre maximum fee stipulation does not apply.) <br /> Park/Trail Easement/Fees or Dedication Needed <br /> The 2008-2030 CMP Comprehensive Trail System Map (Exhibit BB) indicates that a future trail is planned <br /> on Bayside Road (CSAH 84). The Planning Commission should discuss the merits of an easement for trail <br /> purposes adjacent to Bayside Road over the 50-foot road corridor outlot. <br /> The Park Fee is determined as 8�0 of the fair market value of the land being subdivided, or a maximum <br /> of$5,550 per residential dwelling unit. The Hennepin County Assessor has indicated that 8%of the raw <br /> land value will exceed the maximum fee. Once the land is reassessed following development the value <br /> will increase again. Therefore, for this property, staff has determined that as there will be five new <br /> dwelling sites,the Park Fee will be$27,750. <br /> Utility Locations and Availability <br /> The subject property is not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA);sewer service is <br /> not available to these properties. The properties are proposed to be served by septic systems and <br /> private wells. All septic systems must be located 20' from all property boundaries, 20' from structures, <br /> hardcover and the delineated edge of wetlands. Private wells shall b.e setback 3'from structures and 50' <br /> from septic systems. Septic system designs have been submitted to the City and have been approved <br /> by Willie Gibbs,Septic Manager. <br /> Issues for Discussion <br /> Conservation Desi�n: The developer has prepared a Conservation Design Report which identifies areas <br /> where trees and positive views should be preserved; the plan also outlined invasive, non-native species <br /> to be removed. The report indicates the individual land owners should be responsible for invasive <br /> species removal upon construction of a new home. Staff would recommend the responsibility of the <br /> initial removal be placed on the developer; the homeowners association should be responsible for <br /> ongoing maintenance. The planning commission should direct the applicant in this regard. Additionally, <br /> the planning commission should identify other areas which should be reviewed, protected or preserved <br /> as part of the plat if appropriate. � <br /> Access: The applicant is proposing to create an Outlot connecting to an existing outlot corridor for the <br /> new private road. The applicant has indicated that creating the private road to City standards may <br /> impact their lot layout and ultimately may not be feasible considering the existing connecting outlot <br /> configuration. Staff has requested a revised road layout which better meets the City's standards; at the <br /> drafting of this report the revised plan has not been submitted or reviewed by staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.