Laserfiche WebLink
� #12-358�. " t <br /> 11 February 2013 � <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> survey. Due to the other constraints of the property (width; rear/street setback; existing, shared driveway <br /> location; etc) the proposed location may still be the best option even though the top of bluff appears to have <br /> moved up the slope, 10+feet into the building envelope. <br /> The revised top of bluff location results in an even more restricted buildable envelop than previously realized. <br /> The applicant's proposed home is generally consistent with the 2006 plans and reflects only an additional�4 <br /> feet of depth added on to the garage to make it more functional (resulting in the 10' vs. 13' side proposed <br /> � setback from the alley). To further push the house away from the bluff results in an unreasonably small home . <br /> considering the established driveway location. � <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning staff has requested feedback from the DNR. This information should be available prior to the City <br /> Council's next review of the application. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and his comments are <br /> attached. � <br /> Planning staff has reviewed the revised plans and recommends approval of the variances as requested <br /> consistent with the February survey and revised house plans showing the reoriented deck. It should be noted <br /> the proposed home location will result in minor grading within the bluff and bluff impact zone to <br />� accommodate drainage. The deck will be installed using helical screws. <br />