Laserfiche WebLink
. . • , i <br /> . . , � <br /> - ���' . CITY of UR4N0 .� � <br /> � :,� O . <br /> , s � ,� RESOLUTION OF TI� CITY COUNCIL <br /> _ �, � N0.� t4. � � <br /> � � ' ~ <br /> G <br /> �,�,�sHO�,�y � � . <br /> WI�EREAS, it is the City's intent t13a.t in the event Outtots B and D are used in � <br /> the futu,z'e for road purposes that�such road shall be constructed ta City standards, Further, it � <br /> is the City's intent that in order to 'guarantee the future access to Outlot C, applicants shall : <br /> provide to the City standard road and utility easements over Outlots B and D. It is the City's i <br /> farther intent that if Outlot C is developed without the need for access via Outl.oes B and D, that � <br /> such road and utility easements will be vacated upon formai zequest of the property owners; and � <br /> , <br /> WHEREAS, it is the City's intent that Outlots A, B and C shall remain in private � <br /> common ownership until Outlot C is further developed, and that Outlot D shall remain in private : <br /> common ownership with proposed Lot 1, Block 2 until Outlot C is fuxther developed; and <br /> 'VP�REA,S, it is the City's intent that at khe time �utlot C is fizrther develaped, � <br /> the City�wil�l at that•time require the payment of�ark dedication fees and the dedication of any , <br /> Aadditional•necessary and�appropziate puhlic easements within Outlots A, B, C and D; and . . <br /> , � <br /> � �yVHEREAS, it is the City's intent that proposed Lot 1,Block 1 azsd proposed Lot ; <br /> , �1, Block 2 grant the standaxd periweter utility and drainage easements based on the assumgtion , <br /> tl�at Outlots B and D will� in the future become a roadway; and <br /> WFIEREAS, although Hennepin County Department .of Public Wozks has <br /> requested additional right-of-way for County Road 84, no additional County road right-of-way <br /> will be required of t�ie developer consistent witli the standards for a collector road as defined <br /> in the Orono Comprehensive Plan; and <br /> yVHEREAS, a driveway easement over Outlot B shall be granted in favor of <br /> pro�osed Lot 1, Block i for the e�cisting driveway in Ouxlot B; and <br /> WHEREAS, the existing accessory metal shed located at the norkt�west coraner of �. <br /> Outlot C wiil become non-conforming upan fuial plat approval due to lack of a principai <br /> residence structure and naust be removed within one year of final plat approval unless it is <br /> uicorporated into a subdivision of Outlot C into buildable lots and made canfornaing at that time; . <br /> and <br /> 'WFiEI�EAS,the single family residences existing on proposed Lot 1, Block 1 and � <br /> proposed Lot 1, Block 2 require no furtb.er variances; and • <br /> Page 3 of b <br /> ' fom50060UhOroa <br />