My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
02-19-2013 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2013 3:31:01 PM
Creation date
4/1/2013 3:30:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
View images
View plain text
� `� <br /> Levang asked how close the deck is to the top of the bluff. <br /> Curtis indicated it is probably just a few feet. The deck was moved out of the area that the Planning <br /> Commission saw as the bluff depicted on the survey they reviewed. Since the deck is going to be built on <br /> post footings and not have a foundation,the impact to the bluff is not as severe. <br /> Levang noted it is still a few feet from the top of the bluff. " <br /> McMillan asked if the application has to be renoticed for public heanng.��;����� <br /> Mattick indicated what is bein discussed is not a sub'stantia"1 chan�and that it would not need to be <br /> g g,�. <br /> renoticed. <br /> Colson stated they have been trying for quite some time�to�get this ap�proved and at they ini"tially felt <br /> that it would go through relatively quickly since it was already appxoved in 2006. <br /> Printup stated since this plan has previously been approved,the onl�,�thin�t�stood for him out was the � <br /> deck. Printup indicated he is okay with the deck o"'ing Y'�to the bluff im act zone. <br /> .� � �-.- <br /> Colson stated being a deck,there are other th3ngs they�can do m or.der to carry he load points for the <br /> deck. Colson indicated on one side of the propezty there is more a a�s.wale between the two properties <br /> and that there is not lakeshore there. - <br /> Levang stated she would be in favor of the application going back to the Planning Commission. <br /> McMillan indicated she also woul�be i" favor of th�Planning C�mission revisiting the plan. <br /> � �````��.� <br /> Levang stated she would alsoaike the DNR to weigh in on this application since there was a failure in the <br /> past. <br /> Curtis indicated she does not -_ow whether that would happen before the Planning Commission meeting <br /> but tha�she will�-forward the inf rmation t�o the��. <br /> Joffn Rod�l" ,4725 North�e Driv�e,�'stated the reason the hillside failed was that a number of years ago <br /> whoever lived there threw all their garl'aage over the side. When the hillside failed,there were plastic <br /> �b�ttles arid"nii�lk cartons that caused#he�less friction slide that sent the entire hillside into the lake. Rodel <br /> sta�ed,,�t was agar�bage issue and�not a structural dirt issue. Rodel stated hopefully the subject property <br /> does nofi ave this sa�m�e problem. <br /> � � ,� <br /> Colson stated tl�e deck will not dis rb the soil and that it could be as simple as drilling a screw into the <br /> ground. Colson�at d they will'�not be changing or disturbing the soil. <br /> Levang moved,Bremer econded,to send Application#12-3582,Colson Custom Homes on behalf <br /> of BWB Holdings,LLC,4731 North Shore Drive,back to the Planning Commission for an <br /> additional review at their February meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).