Laserfiche WebLink
� � °� � <br /> 0 0 <br /> ��g - CITY o� 4R4N0 <br /> � � ���. � <br /> ti . <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L�4 4��'G N0. � � y . <br /> k'EsK� � <br /> 1. The �roperties are located witluil tlie LR-1B, One Fa�nily Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District requiring a rniiumum of 140' iii lot width and <br /> 1.0 acres of contiguous diy buildable la.nd witlun each newly created lot. <br /> 2. The proposed lot 1'u1e reanan;einent and street vacation encompasses <br /> three residential lots and a part of vacated Lake Street, containing a total <br /> of 0.�8 acres of land. <br /> 3. Upon completioil of the lot liiie reaazan�ement, 4731 North Shore Drive <br /> . will contain approximately 11,553 s.f. (0.26 acres) and 60' in defiiled � <br /> width wluch will continue to be nonconforming with respect to lot area <br /> and lot width within the LR-1B, One Family Lalceshore Residential <br /> Zoning District. <br /> 4. Upon completion of the lot line rearran�einent, 4725 North Shore Drive <br /> will contain appro�iinately 13,927 s.f. (0.32 acres) and 75' in defined <br /> width which will continue to be nonconfoiznin� with respect to lot area <br /> and lot width withiil the LR-1B, One Family Lalceshore Residential <br /> Zoning District. <br /> 5. But for tlie availability of all three parcels for coinbination/division at the <br /> same time,it is probable that atteinpts would be made to redevelop each of <br /> the three parcels individually, or at least to redevelop the westerly parcel <br /> • separately from the easterly two parcels, resulting in the need for greater <br /> variances and less flexibility of site design due to the narrow, steep nature <br /> of the lots. The opportunity to requixe a shared driveway access would <br /> also be lost. Additioiially, Uecause two of the parcels have been assessed <br /> for and provided wit11 municipal sewer, and have beeii developed with <br /> sinjle family residences for maily years, it is ui�likely that the City would <br /> deny variances for a total of two homes on the three parcels. The <br /> proposed combination/subdivision results in two lots that can Ue <br /> developed inore efficiently tha.n if such a re-ananjement was not <br /> occuirin�. " <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the vacation of a portion of Lalce Street as <br /> proposed is in lceepin�with the public interest and not in conflict with the <br /> provisions of the Orono ComnZUnity Ma�la�ement Plan in consideration of <br /> the followiii�findinas: <br /> PaQe 3 of 9 <br />