Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,January 22,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Curtis stated the area will remain as it is currently. Curtis noted a portion of it will remain grass once the <br /> road is constructed. <br /> Schoenzeit moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application#13-3589,Bauer <br /> Design,Inc.,on behalf of Pine Corner Properties,450 Old Crystal Bay Road North,subject to staff <br /> recommendations and the condition that a cross easement or other agreement be entered into in <br /> order to deal with future parking considerations if one or both properties come under different <br /> ownership. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 6. 12-3586 CITY OF ORONO,ZONING CODE—CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING <br /> ANIMALS,7:20 P.M.—8:10 P.M. <br /> Curtis noted this application initially was a pair of housekeeping text amendments to Sections 78-394, 78- <br /> �419, and 78-443 regarding the keeping of farm animals as an accessory use in Rural Residential Districts. <br /> The revision would eliminate language that was inadvertently added via Ordinance 82,Third Series,in <br /> December of 2010, suggesting a conditional use permit is needed for this accessory use in RR districts; <br /> and Section 78-566 correcting a cross-reference to the list of accessory uses in the RS Seasonal <br /> Recreational District which was not corrected when Ordinance 90 Third Series was adopted in December, <br /> 2011. <br /> At the December 10,2012,City Council meeting tabled the amendment and directed Staff to broaden its <br /> scope to additionally address two animal-related topics: <br /> 1. Define a process and/or provide guidelines for Council's use of its discretion in determining <br /> whether or when to allow horse pasture requirements to be reduced; and <br /> 2. Review and address the issue of how many chickens or fowl can be harbored on a residential <br /> property;the inference being that current code defining 50 chickens as one animal unit coupled <br /> with one animal unit allowed per acre may be excessive. <br /> Curtis stated while the text language has been restructured slightly since 1975,the basic elements have <br /> not changed. The following are a few key concepts that should be reinforced: <br /> 1. At least three acres are required to have a horse,of which two acres must be open pasture. This <br /> means that most properties developed in Orono's 2-acre zone in the past 35 to 40 years cannot <br /> have a horse. <br /> 2. Only two acres are required to have animals other than horses: "There must be at least one acre <br /> for the dwelling and one acre for each animal unit." The code previous indicated this non- <br /> dwelling acre is"in aggregate"but it has never stated for such non-horse animals that this acre <br /> must be pasture. <br /> The question of fractional animal units should be answered. On a 1.9 acre lot,there are two potential <br /> - interpretations of the code: <br /> - One cannot have any farm animals; or <br /> - One can have 0.9 anixnal unit. <br /> Page 9 of 18 <br />