Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 9,1996 <br />( #3) COUNTY ROAD 6 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - FINAL <br />• <br />PLANS - COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - RESOLUTION #3816 <br />Bruce Polaczyk and Steve Theis of Hennepin County were present. <br />Polaczyk indicated the County is requesting approval of the final plans and the <br />cooperative agreement for the CoRd 6 improvement project. <br />Theis relayed some of the history behind CoRd 6 noting the roadway has reached the end <br />of its service life. The proposed reconstruction does not add capacity. It will remain a 2 <br />lane road with added safety features such as turn lanes and improved sight lines. Theis <br />said the county attempted to narrow the corridor to eliminate impact to adjacent <br />properties. The reconstruction runs from Townline Road to McCulley with two 12' lanes <br />and 8' shoulder requiring a total 88' of right -of -way. From McCulley Road to Hwy 12, <br />turn lanes will be added increasing the width of right -of -way to 102'. The right -of -way of <br />66' for the City street section is a change from the last Council meeting. <br />Callahan received confirmation from Theis that the estimated cost to the City for the <br />reconstruction is $515,000. Theis informed Callahan that the time table for the <br />reconstruction will have a fall, 1997, start for utility relocation, clearing and grubbing. <br />The actual roadway construction will take place in 1998. The ability to move the utilities <br />prior to the actual construction allows the project to be completed in 1998. <br />• <br />Callahan asked if the roadway would be closed during construction. Theis said the road <br />will be detoured to CoRd 19 but open for local traffic. Callahan noted that the road <br />improvement does not reach the intersection of CoRd 6 and Hwy 12. That improvement <br />will be dovetailed in with the Hwy 12 Alternate 6 reconstruction. <br />Sandy Larson, 4285 6th Avenue North, asked the Council not to approve the plans and <br />agreement until staking has taken place. Callahan asked when the staking would be <br />performed. Theis said the staking would be completed in the next few days. He also <br />indicated no major shifts are expected in the alignment. "Tweaking" the plan in relation <br />to a specific property may be done if it does not affect other properties. <br />Larry McFarlane agreed with Larson. He indicated the stakes would allow the property <br />owners to visualize the effect from the reconstruction. He asked that final approval be <br />withheld until the staking is completed. McFarlane is concerned the construction will <br />have a major impact on the entrance into the subdivision and asked that the County speak <br />further with those along the roadway. <br />Jabbour said it was his understanding that the County was going to meet with the <br />property owners. Theis indicated several people with whom he has met or talked with on <br />the telephone. Jabbour reported someone being concerned with further shifting of the <br />roadway. <br />• <br />