My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-12-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:22:06 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:22:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 1996 <br />• ( #6 - 92179 Theresa Norsted - Continued) <br />Callahan asked Mabusth if the survey was satisfactory. Mabusth said the survey was <br />current. <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3800 noting the garage <br />dimensions as 26'x22'. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( #7) #2183 CHARLES KRAMER, 2990 SOMERSET LANE - CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3801 <br />The applicant was present. <br />Mabusth reviewed the land holdings of the applicant which include three parcels, one <br />being his homestead. The application is for a conditional use permit and does not require <br />any variances. The wetlands in question are of a type 7. John Smythe, an aquatic <br />scientist with Bonestroo, reviewed the wetlands. One wetland area was found to be <br />degraded, and the proposed dredging would result in an upgraded wetland. The other <br />wetland was found to be untouched and not degraded. Smythe recommended that this <br />particular wetland should be left intact. The proposal would result in a loss of trees. <br />Smythe did suggest the buckthorn growth could be removed. The applicant amended his <br />application after receiving Smythe's recommendation. <br />• Mabusth reported that the Planning Commission recommended the alteration of only the <br />one pond and denying alteration of the pond located in the southeast corner. Conditions <br />placed on the application include the spoils be limited in their removal to the applicant's <br />property to the north only. The type 1 and 2 wetlands are to be staked in the field and a <br />26' separation maintained. Both septic sites are to be protected and fenced off. Erosion <br />control is to be maintained until the ground cover has been restored. <br />Kramer indicated that he was satisfied with the Planning Commission's recommendation <br />and stipulations. <br />Goetten asked Mabusth if there should be any specific wording in the resolution to <br />maintain the "Hardwood Swamp" as recommended to be left untouched by Smythe to <br />protect the land in the future. Mabusth said the area is now identified as a "Hardwood <br />Swamp" Type 7 and would be limited to only that now spelled out by such a <br />classification. Jabbour noted that the ordinances in effect now only prohibit the cutting of <br />trees. Mabusth indicated that the wetland is not a designated wetland of the City but is <br />protected under permit reviews by Corp of Engineer and MCWD. <br />City Attorney Radio suggested a conservation easement be placed over the property if <br />the City wants it to be protected. He indicated that the application process is the <br />appropriate time in which to make this request. Goetten said she would like to see this <br />• conservation easement be taken if Kramer was in agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.