Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 14, 1996 <br />(Corridor Selection for Hwy 12 Upgrade - Continued) <br />Jane Slaughter, 4545 Wayzata Boulevard, said she lives on Hwy 12, west of the corridor. <br />She has similar concerns regarding Hwy 12 as expressed by Council Member Kelley. Her <br />driveway will be on Hwy 12, and she has concern for bus safety for the children. She <br />asked that this be a consideration. Callahan said the Council will consider her concerns <br />and noted Mn/DOT also has those concerns. Slaughter asked if the Council would work <br />with the City of Medina as her driveway is located in both communities. Callahan <br />informed her that specific problems are not part of the debate at this time as the road <br />design is currently unknown. Slaughter asked that she not be left out and forgotten <br />noting that the only access onto Hwy 12 will be hers if the improvements are made. <br />Callahan reported that Mn/DOT will bring back the designs to the cities to review <br />problems and hardships. <br />John Winston said the alternative is a vast improvement and recognized the work behind <br />the proposal. Winston said he sees a problem during the two hours of rush period in the <br />morning and two hours in the afternoon and in only those time periods. He said, in <br />looking at the present corridor, there is room for improvement and expansion, but did <br />note the bottleneck that occurs in Long Lake. If Alternative 6 goes forward, Winston <br />asked that those who live nearby be given consideration regarding the noise issue. <br />George Hutchins, 2550 Woodhaven Drive, Orono, said his property would not be taken <br />but would be affected as it is located adjacent to the highway. He is concerned that there • <br />are more questions unanswered than answered and is concerned with the urgency to vote. <br />He asked the Council not to vote at this time. He said he is also concerned for Long <br />Lake and questioned whether State funding for the City will be affected by the direction <br />taken for or against. Callahan informed Hutchins that the vote will not affect funding as <br />it is set up by other departments. He noted there have been other votes on Mn/DOT <br />actions with no recourse. Callahan also said he does not share the concern regarding the <br />urgency issue. He would like to see it move forward. Callahan noted that until ground is <br />broken, there will be many answers unknown. Callahan commented that choosing an <br />alternative eliminates concern over other areas, and he is of the opinion that the vote <br />should have taken place sooner. <br />Doug Coleman commented that the issue is of homes being held hostage with the <br />unknown location of the corridor. With the corridor decided, the determination can be <br />made for who will be affected. Because of that, Coleman asked if the Council is willing <br />to support lowering taxes for those affected. Callahan responded that if the property <br />values go down, the property taxes will automatically go down as the value does. When <br />asked if he supported that, Callahan said he was not sure that the values will decrease but <br />would if that occurred. Jabbour asked to consider values going up. Coleman said these <br />homes are unable to be sold to anyone at this time. <br />12 <br />