Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 <br />( 912 - Request for Sewer - Continued) <br />Jabbour asked Cook to give an approximate cost for sewer to Maresh. Cook said the <br />cost of installation would be similar to other units. The cost to run the line to the <br />applicant's house would be approximately $20,000 with an additional $3,000 for hook up. <br />Jabbour added that with the $16,000 per unit project assessment, the cost would be at a <br />total of about $40,000. Cook said if the applicant was included in the project and <br />included in all of the numbers, then the total cost for the units would be divided by the <br />number of units for his cost. Jabbour said it was his understanding that the applicant <br />would have to absorb the additional costs involved. Jabbour considered the calculation <br />to be a cost as part of the total project plus an individual cost to carry forth the line to the <br />applicant's home. Cook said that would be another way of looking at it. Callahan said <br />others should not have to pay part of the sewer cost for Maresh. Hurr noted that there <br />would be other costs than just that of bringing the line to his home as he would have to <br />pay for part of the total project as well. From the discussion and differing viewpoints, it <br />was determined that the cost calculation would have to be reviewed in order to arrive at <br />the cost for sewer to the Maresh residence. <br />Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to table the request for City sewer until the <br />determination was made for use of the 50 undefined units. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />• <br />Callahan noted the uncertainty of the costs involved. He said the feasibility study is being <br />performed while the City is awaiting word from the Met Council. There is a time frame • <br />question. Maresh noted the upcoming meeting of his neighborhood regarding sewering. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />Mayor Callahan reported that the highway department is holding a public information <br />meeting on September 30 to discuss the corridor selection for Hwy 12. Callahan said it <br />has been years since the Council has formally reviewed its position regarding Hwy 12 and <br />feels the State is now closer in its position to that of the City. Callahan asked that a <br />public hearing be held to allow residents comments and the position of the Council <br />clarified. He suggested the Council agenda for October 14 reflect this hearing and asked <br />that zoning issues be eliminated as well as Park Commission and Planning Commission <br />comments due to the probable length of the public hearing. Mabusth said all of the <br />zoning applications were heard at this meeting so there would be no problem from a <br />zoning standpoint. Callahan also asked that additional notices regarding action by the <br />Council on this subject be made known to the public. <br />Jabbour reported that Mn/DOT held a meeting to brief those interested on their present <br />plans. Questions which arose were why the 4 lane option was eliminated, and why <br />Watertown Road was eliminated. Jabbour said it was noted that CoRd 6 was a very <br />integral area for access in and out of the City, and the intersections of North Brown, <br />Willow, Old Crystal Bay Road, and the new Watertown Road were critical. <br />• <br />10 <br />