My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
09-09-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:18:41 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:18:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 <br />• (94 - #2151 John and Joanne Hurd - Continued) <br />Mabusth noted that the City does not recognize the agreed upon line but shall adress <br />variances to the average lakeshore setback line as defined in zoning code. The property <br />encroaches the code's average lakeshore setback by 11' for the 3 -story bay and the grade <br />level screened porch by 17'. The southwest corner of the main level deck further <br />encroaches this setback line by 20'. The setback line pushes the new construction to the <br />east creating an excess of hardcover in the 250 -500' setback area. The amended plan <br />calls for 23.7% in this zone where 25% is allowed. The 250 -500' zone will consist of an <br />excess of 671 s.f. or 8.9% excess where 30% is allowed overall. Mabusth combined the <br />hardcover totals for the two zones and presented it in that manner. The Planning <br />Commissioners did not seek any additional hardcover removals and supported the <br />application as presented accepting the hardcover excess and the agreed upon setback line. <br />Coombs pointed out that the setback line drawn was an attempt to maintain green space. <br />The projection still encroaching the line was said to not be visible by either neighboring <br />side. He also noted the desire to not disturb the site and maintain the hill and trees. <br />Goetten said she was present at both Planning Commission reviews and appreciated the <br />work of the applicant in working out the situation with their neighbors. She said she <br />personally perfers any excess in hardcover to be located further back on the lot and away <br />from lake. Goetten sees no problem with the existing boathouse as it is attractive and in <br />• excellent condition. She did note, however, that the Council would not look favorably on <br />any future hardcover variance. <br />Jabbour questioned why the 0 -75' and 75 -250' zones were noted together instead of <br />separately. Mabusth said it was done to show the impact of the project on the entire lot <br />adding that this combination has been asked for in the past. Jabbour said he prefers to <br />keep the zones separated to eliminate any clustering by the lake. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3756. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( * #5) #2155 NANCY KRAUSE AND DON HANDLIN, 3860 NORTH SHORE <br />DRIVE - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION <br />#3757 <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3757, approving a subdivision <br />of a lot line rearrangement for Nancy Krause and Dan Handlin and the City of Orono at <br />3860 North Shore Drive. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.