My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
08-26-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:18:13 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:18:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
do <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 26, 1996 <br />• ( #6 - 92158 John O'SuIlivan/Grace Baptist Church Property - Rezoning - Continued) <br />Gaffron informed the Council that the Planning Commission reviewed the rezoning and <br />recommended approval by a vote of 6/0. Noted in their conditions and reasoning was the <br />concern for the property in its present distressed condition and vacancy. The Planning <br />Commission recommended rezoning without performance of a comprehensive study of <br />the Navarre area because of the church condition and its location being surrounded by <br />commercial on two sides. They also thought the B -5 zoning matched the proposed uses <br />and noted the overwhelming support being given by the residents and businesses in the <br />surrounding area. The Commissioners saw this development as being a possible catalyst <br />for improving the Navarre area. <br />Gaffron noted that the Planning Commission also saw the need to change wording within <br />the B -5 zoning list of allowed uses. They asked that the B -5 zoning be amended to <br />eliminate some of the uses they see as inappropriate to the times. <br />Gafli-on noted the petitions and letters of approval within the information packets. The <br />Council was asked to take formal action for either adoption, denial, or tabling, and to <br />direct Staff whether to proceed with amending the B -5 code. <br />Callahan asked O'Sullivan for his comments. O'Sullivan reported that he was involved in <br />the B -5 selection for the property. He read the zoning codes and saw the B -5 as the best <br />• fit for the property and neighborhood. Two public tent meetings were then held. People <br />living within 600' of the property as well as a 6 square block area were notified of the <br />meetings. The meetings were attended by 80 people. O'Sullivan said there were no <br />objections voiced to the proposal. O'Sullivan also noted that Planning Commission Chair <br />Peterson and two other Commissioners attended at least one meeting. Peterson was said <br />to have stated at the meeting that the Commission does not take rezoning Iightly. <br />O'Sullivan noted that Peterson made the motion for approval at the Planning Commission <br />meeting commenting that the proposed use was the best fit for the site. <br />O'Sullivan also reported that he contacted 80% of the businesses in the community. All <br />of those contacted gave their support of the proposal and signed a petition. <br />O'Sullivan also said he has received support of the City Staff. He reported that in <br />meetings with Shawn Gustafson, City Engineer, and a County engineer, no red flags were <br />thrown regarding access except that they not be too close to the corner. O'Sullivan noted <br />a letter from Gustafson dated March 12 that states it appears the use is good and feasible <br />from an engineering standpoint. Gustafson confirmed stating this in the letter. <br />O'Sullivan asked the Council to endorse the rezoning. He noted the number of letters <br />received favoring the proposal and related some of the comments received. <br />• Dan Clausen added that he would like to see the property sold noting that O'Sullivan has <br />been the first developer with both a good plan and finances to back it up. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.