My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
07-22-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:17:22 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:17:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 22, 1996 <br />( 910 - Stormwater Management Plan - Continued) • <br />Kelley asked who would spend the money for the plan, the City or the developer. <br />Moorse said the City would spend the money on planning the sub - watershed ponds <br />beyond what is done by the developer. Kelley asked for an example citing the Dickey <br />property. Cook said the developer would have been charged a fee in addition to being <br />asked to develop small ponds on their sites, which they laid out and paid for themselves. <br />Kelley asked what the problem was with that solution. Cook said it only reflects one site <br />rather than being looked at in a comprehensive manner. Jabbour said the developer could <br />have been asked to contribute to a master pond. He noted that each neighborhood is <br />different and possibly no pond would have been required on the property but a <br />contribution made to another pond. This could have resulted in more land being available <br />for development also. <br />Cook said the plan is in two parts: 1) volume of discharge and 2) water quality. Cook <br />said it would be the intent of the plan to design a stormwater drainage system that <br />addresses water quality. Cook noted it is difficult to address water quality improvement <br />on an individual property basis. <br />Callahan asked what can be done once small problems are identified on individual lots. <br />Cook said the plan would show ponding sites and costs. It would also look at <br />undeveloped land to be used for ponding. Callahan asked if the land would be taken and <br />the owner charged for a pond. Cook said the land would be purchased. He suggested • <br />this could be funded by a storm sewer trunk charge on new development and a <br />stormwater utility fee on all properties in the City. Jabbour said the stormwater trunk <br />charge would be similar to the Park Dedication Fund. <br />Kelley noted the premise is that new development should not increase the velocity of <br />stormwater drainage from the property. Cook said ponds would slow it down and be <br />more efficient for all. <br />Callahan asked if the City was being required by the Met Council to develop a <br />stormwater plan. Gaffron said the City was under the obligation to the Met Council as <br />well as the MCWD to complete the plan. <br />Gaffron said the Staff is being hindered by the lack of such a plan. He cited day -to -day <br />examples such as high water levels on Mooney Lake and the lack of data to identify <br />stormwater elevations on the ponds. A plan would enable the City to have a better <br />handle on what is occurring within the City. Highwood area was cited. Goetten asked if <br />the low area created to catch water was doing its job. Gaffron said it does not catch all <br />of the water from the neighborhood. Gerhardson said major repairs were done but it only <br />works to its capacity. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.