My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
06-24-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:16:25 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:16:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 24, 1996 <br />(416 - Saga Hill Land Acquisition - Continued) <br />• <br />Jabbour said he was confused why the City should give the Minnesota Land Trust a <br />conservation easement. Leone cited an example of property in a suburb that had placed a <br />conservation easement on it 20 years ago and changes in feelings as time goes on. Leone <br />said she saw the conservation easement as reasonable with land being given free to the <br />City. Callahan informed her that the land was not entirely free as there is a matter of lost <br />property taxes. Callahan also said there is a public policy against tying up land forever <br />noting the desire for open space might change in the future. Leone said that would be <br />sad adding that the Minnesota Land Trust feels areas of land should be left undeveloped. <br />Hurr said she did not want to see any conservation easement on either parcel. Leone said <br />the discussion at the board level of the Minnesota Land Trust called for a conservation <br />easement on both parcels but would have to be discussed regarding any separation of the <br />two parcels. Leone said it was not acceptable to the Minnesota Land Trust not to have a <br />conservation easement. <br />Jabbour asked why this was not discussed earlier in the process. Jabbour added that the <br />Council must protect all of their citizens. <br />Hun noted that the conservation easement allows for minor uses of recreation such as <br />trails and asked what type of trails that would involve. Leone said this would have to be <br />• discussed. <br />• <br />Callahan said the answers need to be found regarding the environmental issue, the <br />Minnesota Land Trust's opinion from their board on the easement, and the condition of <br />the grant. He said the Council will not have any easement placed on the 9 -1/2 acre <br />parcel. Callahan asked that the answers be brought back to the July 8 meeting of the <br />Council. <br />Callahan asked Leone to inquire about an extension of the purchase agreement and to <br />inform the City if any problems arise. Callahan said he appreciates the work done by the <br />Minnesota Land Trust and the Saga Hill group. <br />Jabbour was informed that the contract was a purchase agreement, not an option to <br />purchase. Jabbour said a purchase agreement would require a formal cancellation. <br />Jabbour asked about the expiration date of the DNR grant. Moorse said he did not have <br />that date. Leone said she thought the grant expired in 1997. <br />Hurr inquired about other agreements where the Minnesota Land Trust has been the <br />conduit. Leone informed her of several. Both examples had conservation easements. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.