My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
05-13-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:15:02 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:15:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•1 r <br />. i. <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996 <br />(Park Commission Comments - Continued) <br />• <br />Goetten asked for an update at the next Council meeting noting the large amount of time <br />committed by the Park Commission. She felt it was important to extend the faith given in <br />the trail plan and proceed with construction unless there are changes to impede its <br />progress. <br />Callahan asked Moorse to place the bike trial on the next Council meeting agenda. <br />Flint informed the Council that the Commission is moving forward with the Park and <br />Open Space Plan. The Park Commission is meeting on May 24 for its own work session <br />and will be ready to meet with the Council in the beginning of June to solicit their input. <br />A time for the work session between the Council and Commission will be set at that time. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Commissioner Hawn said she stood by the report as submitted and had no further <br />comments. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public comments. <br />• ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />( #4) #2088 WINFIELD STEPHENS, 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION #3720 <br />Mr. Stephens was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the vacation of the 30' alley to the west of the property has been <br />completed. The original comprehensive application involved both the current and former <br />owner for both the vacation and variance application for proposed improvements. The <br />Planning Commission had recommended the vacation be completed prior to review of the <br />variance portion of the application. <br />Mabusth reviewed the improvements proposed for the property consisting of a grade <br />level and second story additions to house, detached garage, and roofed deck. There was <br />a question on whether the original stone foundation would support a new second story <br />residence. The building inspector approved the use of the original foundation with a new <br />support wall at the easst wall. Mabusth noted that the applicant has met with the <br />neighbors to the west of Landmark Drive, and they have agreed to a 15' setback from the <br />west lot line where an existing garage encroaches 1' to Tinto Landmark Drive right -of- <br />way. <br />U <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.