Laserfiche WebLink
e <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1996 <br />( #13 - Dan Handlin - Continued) • <br />Approval of the request would enable the current driveway to conform. Repositioning of <br />the driveway would be the less desired solution. Moorse said the driveway could be <br />installed on the side of the house where it was originally located. This is said to be <br />feasible but would have impacts on the property. Hardships are listed. <br />Callahan noted that it is not legal for the City to sell the property. Moorse said the parcel <br />is owned by the City for a specific use only, similar to a lease situation. Once the <br />property is used for other purposes, ownership would be reconveyed to the County. The <br />parcel could then be made available to the adjoining property owner at market value. <br />Moorse reported that the City owns lots 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 for use as open space. <br />Lot 23, the Iot in question, has sewer lines running thru it as well as a wetland area that <br />extends into lot 24. <br />Hun said she was concerned with setting a precedent noting that there is an alternate <br />solution of moving the driveway. <br />Hun inquired about maintaining an easement on the lot. Moorse said the City would do <br />a lot division reconveying only a portion of the lot necessary to remedy the driveway <br />problem back to the County and maintain that portion of the lot containing the wetlands <br />and sewer line. 0 <br />Property owner, Don Handlin, said they purchased the property knowing the problem but <br />still desiring the property. It is their intent to solve the issue in a reasonable fashion. <br />Handlin said the best solution is that which is proposed. Changing the driveway would <br />result in the loss of mature trees and landscaping. Handlin said he sees the request as <br />reasonable. He said he is not at fault for the occurrence of the problem but is responsible <br />for resolving it. Handlin said he agrees with the conditions 1-4 as listed. He noted that <br />the property would also be placed back on the tax roll. Handlin said, as far as setting a <br />precedent, he asked what precedent that would be. It is his understanding that no <br />precedent would be set by allowing this purchase to occur. <br />Kelley said that the Council was here to try to help people. <br />Hurr noted that the lot would be deemed unbuildable due to the wetlands. Handlin said <br />he would want to protect the wetlands and understands that the lot is unbuildable. <br />Callahan said he agreed with Kelley noting the public use was not being impacted by this <br />request. <br />Moorse said the Staff agreed with Council Member Hurr that the City should not <br />generally sell off City property, but the circumstances of this request make it a reasonable <br />one. • <br />18 <br />