My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#5125-dening request for EAW-2004
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
Fox Street
>
3250 Fox Street - 05-117-23-44-0012
>
Resolutions
>
#5125-dening request for EAW-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:22:44 PM
Creation date
11/21/2016 11:52:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3250
Street Name
Fox
Street Type
Street
Address
3250 Fox St
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0511723440012
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� o� <br /> 0 0 <br /> ���a� CITY of ORONO <br /> � � � � <br /> � :�� .; � <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L`�kESII��`�� N0. �� <br /> A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT THE <br /> DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL BY BRUCE AND KRISTINE PADDOCK <br /> AND GEORGE STICKNEY HAS NO POTENTIAL <br /> FOR SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, <br /> AND DENYING THE CITIZEN PETITION FOR <br /> PREPARATION OF AN <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) <br /> -FILE #03-2964 <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Orono ("City") is a municipal corparation organized and <br /> existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) has officially notified <br /> the City of a petition by a group of citizens represented by Jack Y. Perry of Briggs and Morgan <br /> requesting the completion of an Environmental Assessinent Worksheet for the proposed development <br /> ("The Development") by Bruce and Kristine Paddock and George Stickney (the "proposers"), City of <br /> Orono plamiing and zoning application File#04-2964; and <br /> WHEREAS, under EQB Rules 4410.0500, the City has been designated as the <br /> appropriate Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) to determine whether an EAW is required. <br /> FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> 1. The City Council finds that the Development does not meet or exceed any of the thresholds of <br /> EQB Rules Part 4410.4300, Subpart 2 through 37, and does not meet or exceed any of the <br /> thresholds of EQB Rules Part 4410.4400, Subparts 2 through 24. Therefore, neither an <br /> Environmental Assessment Worksheet nor an Environmental Impact Statement are mandatory <br /> for the Development under EQB Rules. <br /> 2. The City Council finds that the Development falls within Part 4410.4600 Subpart 2(B) in that all <br /> governmental decisions have not been made, and falls within Part 4410.4600 Subpart 12 <br /> because, while 3 lot development does not exceed the threshold of 20 dwelling units for a fourth <br /> class city, the Development is within a Shoreland Area as defined in EQB Rules 4410.0200. <br /> Therefore, the City council further finds that the Develoment is not specifically exempt from <br /> EQB Rules 4410.0200 to 4410.6500. <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.