My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
02-12-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:09:56 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:09:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 12, 1996 <br />( #8 - #2099 Brueggemann/Maeser - Continued) • <br />Callahan asked Maeser if he had any comments. Maeser informed the Council that he <br />was retired and depended on the cabins for income. If he lost that income and was <br />unable to sell the property as is planned in the proposed application, he said he would be <br />financially bankrupt. Maeser noted that the lots in the neighboring area were all small. <br />He said it was difficult to sell the property as one building site when all the others around <br />him were so small. Maeser said the proposed plan was an opportunity for him to sell and <br />be able to buy another home. <br />Callahan asked Gaffron what the sizes were of neighboring lots. Gaffron noted lots 50' <br />wide made up of a total of 0.2 acres to 1.6 acres. He noted other lots of 3 and 4 acres in <br />the 1 acre zoning district. <br />Hurr noted the nice shoreline on the property, the smaller homes to the north and larger <br />homes to the south. Hurr said the lot could be developed with orientation to the larger <br />lots and could be used for one site. <br />Goetten agreed that the lot was desirable. However, for what the applicant wanted, the <br />proposal does not fit in with the code. Goetten said there were too many variances <br />required and would need to deny the application. <br />There were no public comments. • <br />Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2099 and <br />directed Staff to draft a written resolution for the Council meeting of February 26, which <br />will incorporate the motion and be adopted. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( #9) #2100 ROBERT AND DEBRA EDMUNDS, 1030 TONKAWA ROAD - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3675 <br />The applicants were represented by an architectural representative. <br />The property in question is 1.56 acres in area. All structures on the property will be <br />removed, and a new residence, which will meet all setbacks, will be constructed. <br />Mabusth reported that the original application filed included a request for a conditional <br />use permit for the borrowing of 600 cubic yards of fill. Mabusth said the applicant's <br />architect, Blake Bichanich, reported that the fill would not be borrowed, but instead, <br />would be gained from the excavation for the 2 story, 3 stall garage. In this case, the code <br />indicates no conditional use permit is required. A lot width variance is required as the lot <br />is 101' from the normal high water level at the 75' line, where 140' is needed. <br />• <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.