My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
12-08-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:06:42 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:06:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1997 <br />• ( #15 - Engineer's Report - Continued) <br />• <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Request for Payment #3, Old Crystal <br />Bay Road Trail project to Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of $42,964.31. Vote: Ayes <br />4, Nays 1, Kelley. <br />Flint asked that the record show that the Council was not happy with the fence. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />( #16) TOBACCO - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 164, 2ND SERIES <br />Moorse reported that there are new regulations regarding the sale of tobacco as adopted <br />in State legislation. The requirements can either be enforced by the City or deferred to <br />the County. <br />Goetten asked if the City did the enforcement for a year and found that they would <br />prefer County enforcement, if that could be done. Moorse said he believed so. <br />Goetten said she is appalled that the prohibition does not apply to cigars. It was noted <br />that tobacco products includes cigars but the legislation does not prohibit self - service <br />displays of cigars. <br />Jabbour noted that these are found at Rick's Super Valu and O'Sullivan's. <br />Moorse said he could check to see if the requirement could be made more restrictive. <br />Moorse was asked if the State could be assessed for the time and energy to enforce the <br />requirement. Moorse noted that the City could defer to the County for the enforcement, <br />but the same taxpayers would pay for it. <br />Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt City Tobacco Ordinance and the changes <br />required by State and Federal Law, with the understanding that Staff will review the <br />issue of cigars. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( 918) FIRE, BURGLARY AND SAFETY ALARM REGULATIONS AND <br />REQUIREMENTS - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 165, 2ND SERIES <br />Moorse reported that the amendment is a change in the ordinance as it relates to fire, <br />burglary, and safety alarms. The ordinance currently states that a fee would be charged <br />only after the third false alarm. This amendment allows for a fee to be charged for the <br />second false alarm and is reflected in the fee schedule. The fee schedule is progressive. <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.