Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 <br />( * 411) CITY OF ORONO - ZONING AMENDMENT - LAND ALTERATION <br />REGULATIONS AND PERMIT CRITERIA #102, 2ND SERIES <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Ordinance No. 102, Second Series, an <br />Ordinance Amending the City of Orono Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 <br />and 21, and Section 10.56 Subdivision 16 (J) to Revise and Clarify Requirements and <br />Limitations on Land Alteration and Land Alteration Permits. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( #5) #2264 JANET KIERNAN - CONTINUED <br />Jabbour asked if the Council would be within their jurisdiction to amend the resolution. <br />Barrett said this could occur as long as there were less variances required. <br />Christy said the applicant proposes to rotate the structure clockwise 15 degrees and <br />move it back behind the 75' setback line in its entirety including the terrace. This would <br />allow access to the garage without jamming the structure into it, minimize economical <br />waste, eliminating further excavation, and minimize tree loss. The same variances <br />would be required for side setback and 75 -250' hardcover. Christy said the hardcover <br />would increase in the 75 -250' setback due to the amount that would have been in the 0- <br />75' would now be pushed into the 75 -250' setback. The other variance would be the <br />same for average lakeshore setback. <br />Christy said he would like to see the permit amended, submit site plans, and redesign the 0 <br />interior. If elevation is changing to meet the grade, there may need to be a slight design <br />change making some of the current design of the old home awkward and could be <br />eliminated. This could be accomplished without further increasing the bulk of the <br />structure and resulting in less of the bulk encroaching the side setback. He speculated <br />that there would be no additional fees necessary for the new construction. <br />Jabbour asked about time schedule. Christy said if the footings and concrete work could <br />be done within the next two weeks, there would be no problem with continuing. <br />Jabbour said he would like to reconsider the application with eliminating hardcover in <br />the 0 -75' setback (excluding stairs), and allowing this amount of square footage to be in <br />the 75 -250' setback, maintaining same side setback of 15' with no further encroachment, <br />and eliminating existing footings. Kelley noted that there is 3.9% of hardcover in the 0- <br />75' setback and the 75 -250' setback is currently at 27.6 %. Jabbour noted that the <br />calculations will have to be by square footage. Barrett said the recommendation by <br />Jabbour would be satisfactory. <br />Gaffron indicated there would be no additional fees. The only change might be the <br />valuation for the building permit. Jabbour asked that Staff diligently work with the <br />applicant. <br />is <br />20 <br />