Laserfiche WebLink
Property address: 2555 Fox Street, Orono, MN 55391 _ Inspector initials/Date: �,��Z 3 ) Z <br /> 4. SOII $epdrdtlOn -Compliance component#4 of 5 <br /> Date of installation: 1993 ❑ Unknown Verification method(s): <br /> ShorelandNVellhead protection/Food Beverage �Yes <br /> Lodging't � No Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil <br /> observations by two independent parties are sutficient, <br /> Compliance criteria: unless site conditions have been a/tered or local <br /> requirements differ. <br /> For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and ❑Yes ❑ No <br /> not/ocated in Shoreland or Wellhead � Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) <br /> Protection Area or not serving a food, ❑ Two previous verifications(Attach boring logs) <br /> beverage or lodging establishment: i <br /> ❑ Not applicable (Holding tank(s),no drainfield) <br /> Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical I ❑ Unable to venfy(See Comments/Explanation) <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. ❑ Other(See Comments/Explanation) <br /> Non-performance systems built April 1, i ❑Yes � No Comments/Exp/anation: <br /> 1996, or later o�for non-performance I <br /> systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead <br /> Protection Areas or serving a food, <br /> beverage, or lodging establishment: <br /> Drainfield has a three-foot vertical <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock.* <br /> "Experimental'; "Other'; or "Performance" ❑Yes ❑ No IndiCate depths of elevations <br /> systems built under pre-2008 Ru/es; Type IV <br /> or V systems built under 2008 Ru/es(7080. 24-30 inches <br /> 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector A. Bottom of distribution media from surface <br /> License required) � 42 inches from <br /> Drainfield meets the designed vertical B. Periodicall saturated soil/bedrock surface ___ <br /> separation distance from periodically less than 16 <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. C. System separation inches <br /> � __ D. Required compliance separation' � 36 inChes <br /> AI1y "no"answer above indicates the system is *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local <br /> Failing to Protect Groundwater. Ordinance. <br /> 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*— Compliance component#5 of 5 ❑ Not applicable <br /> Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes ❑ No If"yes",A below is required <br /> Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes ❑ No If"yes", B below is required <br /> BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design <br /> lf the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed. <br /> Compliance criteria <br /> a. Operating Permit number: - ❑Yes ❑ No <br /> Have the Operating Permit re uirements been met? <br /> __b__Is the reguired nitrogen BMP in�lace and_�r�e�functionin ? ❑Yes ❑ No <br /> Any "no"answer indicates Noncompliance. <br /> Upgrade Requirements(Minn. Stat. §115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be upgraded,replaced,or its use <br /> discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect <br /> ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system <br /> is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced, or <br /> - - - - -.. -- -- ------- __ .__- —- --- --... _ ____ _---- -.___- --_ __ _ _ __---------____ <br /> www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats <br /> wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Pa3e 3 of 4 <br />