My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
driveway issues and info
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
Fox Street
>
2530 Fox Street - 04-117-23-41-0010
>
Correspondence
>
driveway issues and info
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:13:25 PM
Creation date
10/21/2016 1:37:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2530
Street Name
Fox
Street Type
Street
Address
2530 Fox St
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0411723410010
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUI�CIL MEETING <br /> , MO\�AY, OCTOBER 14, 2002 <br /> I0. Appeal ofAdministrative Decision—Fox Street Driveway—Continued <br /> r.•- <br /> Moorse stated they needed a gradin�plan to see how the trees would actually be affected <br /> by the driveway installation. <br /> Boyer stated they were anxious to be�in construction on the house. Barrett stated that the <br /> Council could table the application and the applicant would have to revise the plat. They <br /> could still begin construction, but not on the driveway. <br /> Nygard suggested they change the house's design to accommodate the grade, put a drive <br /> off the shared access, and save the trees. <br /> Johnson stated that they had received verbal approval for the plan. Prosa stated the plans <br /> were approved until they went for the building permit. <br /> Nygard stated they might not be able to save the trees anyway. <br /> Weinberger and Gaffron stated they had a grading plan, but it was insufficient and they <br /> needed more detail. <br /> White stated construction on the house could be started, but the curb cut was tabled. <br /> Murphy stated that construction access would be allowed through the shared access drive <br /> only. <br /> Murph�� moved, and Sansevere seconded, to table Item 10, Appeal of Administrative <br /> Decision—Fox Street Driveway. <br /> Vote: A�•es 5, Nays 0. <br /> 4. #02-2764 Commercial Planned Unit Development <br /> Weinberger stated that the City considered a CPUD district following a request for a <br /> proposed office development on a vacant property in Navarre. The multi-unit office <br /> complex would create individual office buildings, each held in private ownership. Such a <br /> development is currently not possible in the B-4 district based on the minimum lot size <br /> and width standards. The CPUD would create a district for the proposed development, <br /> and would create a district that would allow other development options in the commercial <br /> areas of the City where strict compliance to the underlying zoning ordinance is not <br /> practical. <br /> Weinberger stated that the CPUD would not affect the B-2 district, as B-2 is lakefront <br /> property that has been reserved for marina use. The benefits of the CPUD are that it <br /> would allow approval of each site plan with individual performance standards written into <br /> the final development document. If the project were not completed, then the property <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.