Laserfiche WebLink
, �I ��.r���� o��o�u � <br /> Cn,��c��,. �4P�� � �- �- <br /> � � � IQ�/� �'���n�=� lo-z�-o3 <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> ��� �-��,� �;U`��`� �� `�� DATE: October 27, 2003 <br /> G-�`'S�� �S ���OJ� �3 <br /> t) �` �R � ITEM NO.: � � <br /> � ,� <br /> Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br /> Name Gregory A. Gappa Public Services Director's Report <br /> Title Director of Public Services � l� <br /> Item Description: 2530 Fox Street Drivew -Appeal of Administration Decision <br /> � <br /> Construction of a new home on a previously vacant lot on Fox Street is nearing completion. The <br /> issue of the driveway location for this new house was considered by the Council at the October 14, <br /> 2002 meeting. There are two options for the driveway location. The driveway access could either <br /> be loc�ted directly on Fox Street or on an existing shared private drive located adjacent to the house. <br /> The October 14, 2002 staff recommendation was for the new house driveway access to be from the <br /> shared private drive,and the property owner is requesting driveway access directly from Fox Street. <br /> No decision was reached by the Council at this meeting, and the issue was tabled. <br /> Attached is a second request from the property owner for the appeal of an administrative decision <br /> on the driveway location. Also, attached are the Council Minutes and the Request for Council <br /> Action information from the October 24, 2002 meeting. The property owner is requesting direct <br /> driveway access to Fox Street instead of using the shared private driveway for access to Fox Street. <br /> The proposed driveway onto Fox Street is shown as Option 3 on the plans submitted by the property <br /> owner. These plans also show two access points onto the shared driveway. Option 1 which will not <br /> require the removal of any substantial trees has a 23% grade which is too steep for a driveway. <br /> Option 2 has only a 2% grade, but would require the removal of several substantial trees. Another <br /> potential possibility could be to construct a driveway between Options 1 and 2. Moving the <br /> driveway further north will increase the steepness of the driveway, and most likely require removal <br /> of the 32" diameter White Pine tree. <br /> There are several issues to be addressed regarding the driveway location. The first issue concerns <br /> the general City policy in the Comprehensive Plan that driveway access should be minimized on City <br /> streets for new developments. This policy has generally been consistently adhered to for new larger <br /> subdivisions,with all of the driveways located on the new private road. The adherence to this policy <br /> has been somewhat inconsistent for the smaller land divisions. The applicant has noted a year 2001 <br /> front /back lot split on Fox Street in which two separate driveways were allowed instead of one <br /> combined driveway. <br /> The second issue is tree preservation. Orono historically has advocated for the preservation of trees <br /> in order to preserve the rural character of the City when properties are developed. The property <br /> owners request for a driveway access directly onto Fox Street is based on preserving several large <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />