Laserfiche WebLink
� o� <br /> 0 0 <br /> ��b- � C ITY of ORONO <br /> a � <br /> �� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � <br /> ��kESH�4� NO. e� � "7 "� <br /> 4. The e;:istin� ease�r�ent driveway that intersects proposed Lot 2 will not violate <br /> Section 10.03, Subdivi�ion 6 (Bj as there is 2.15 dry cor.tiguous acres to the u�est <br /> of the easement driveway. <br /> 5. In the granting of a�proval of the Beau Marais plat in 1986 the City also granted <br /> variances that allowzd the filling of designated wetlands for the installation of the <br /> driveway to serve the most northern lot or Lot 1 of the Beau Marais plat. <br /> 6. If a private road with cul-de-sac was installed along the east side of properry to <br /> servP all tnree l�ts, a half acre of designated wetlands ��oald be fi11�1. This <br /> improverlent would also result in the loss of several mature everg:een trees alon� <br /> ti�e east side of the property. All three access drives leadin; fro� road would <br /> also encroacr. upon the desijnated wetland areas. <br /> ?, ihe current subdivisian is defined as back lot�front iot subdivisio�� requiring <br /> shared access via a 3�' driveway outlot. Thz driveway ouilot along the east <br /> w�uld be limited to only two users. Lot 2 of the original Beau Marais glat wo�lld <br /> continue to gain access ��ia the existing easement drive. Constz-uction of a drive <br /> would result in the loss of some of the mature evergreen trees planted along the <br /> east pr�perty line. There would be an encroachment of the required 26' setback <br /> from the wetland. There w�ould be additional encroachments of the designated <br /> wetland for the future drive to serve both Lots 1 and 2 of the current subdivisio.n. <br /> 8. The Planning Commission found the creation of two driveways within this <br /> property would have a negative impact upon the aesthetics and sen.�itive <br /> environment of this unique property. <br /> 9. The current owner of Lot 2, Beau Marais, has agreed to maintain the currer�t <br /> looped driveway within their property to serve as a turnaround for emergency <br /> vehicles. . <br /> 10. There is no record of problems reported by the former owners of Lots 1 and 2, <br /> Beau Marais or the cunent owners of Lot 2 in tne use of the current driveway <br /> nor has the City any record of an accident resulting at the intersection of the <br /> private driveway and Fox Street. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />