Laserfiche WebLink
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region <br /> ProjecUSite: 1860 Fox Street City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 5/20/13 <br /> ApplicanUOwner: Lucy Choriey State: MN Sampling Point: 4-1 Up <br /> _ ... ...-- - --------- —- ---...... -- ---- - -- <br /> Investigator(s): David Haar Section,Township,Range: T117N R23W S03 <br /> ---- ---- _ - -- --- ---_ ---..._ ------—-- <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): level Local relief(concave,convex,none): none <br /> Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.967861 Long: -93.571194 Datum: WGS84 <br /> _ _ __ _ ------ <br /> Soil Map Unit Name: Cordova loam NWI Classification: none <br /> — -- -- __----_ ____ . --- - ---_ —____ _ _. <br /> Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed7 <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? Are"normal circumstances"present? Yes <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (if needed,explain any answers in remarks.) <br /> Hydrophytic vegetation present? N <br /> Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N lil <br /> I Indicators of weUand hydrology present? Y If yes,optional wetland site ID: <br /> Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) <br /> Later than normal onset of spring,heavy rains preceding delineation. ; <br /> VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute% Dominant Indicator ' Dominance Test Worksheet <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot s�ze ) Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species that are <br /> __.__.- <br /> 1 OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) <br /> __..__.... _...._ __. <br /> Z Total Number of Dominant Species ' <br /> , 3 Across all Strata: 1 (B) <br /> ___ _.._.. - - - --- _..._ <br /> 4 - _- ___ -_- _ _.____ - - ---_---- _ _ _._._ � Percent of Dominant Species that are <br /> 5 OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.00°/ (A/B) <br /> --- -- _-- ------ - <br /> _-__ - --- <br /> 0 =Total Cover , <br /> , �linq/Shrub stratum (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet , <br /> __.._._.......--._..__ <br /> ' 1 Ulmus amencana 0.1 FACW Total%Cover of: <br /> --------- - <br /> 2 __ I OBL species 0 x 1= 0 <br /> ____- - - - __ <br /> 3 . . FACW species 3.1 x 2= 62 , <br /> ; __--- _---- - ---- - -- - -_ _ <br /> 4 FAC species 3 x 3= 9 <br /> _. ------- _ __._. <br /> 5 FACU species 28 x 4= 112 <br /> ---- ---- - -- __ _ _ _ <br /> 0.1 =Total Cover ' UPL species 0 x 5= 0 <br /> ' Herb stratum (Pbt size: ) ', Column totals 34.1 (A) 127.2 (B) <br /> ---------- -- - - ----_ _ <br /> 1 Taraxacum o(ficinale 20 Y FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.73 <br /> _ ____ ___ _ <br /> , 2 Glechoma hederacea 5 N FACU ' ' <br /> 3 Poa pratensis 3 N FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators. ', <br /> ----- ---- ---_ <br /> 4 Phalans arundinacea 3 N FACW Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation <br /> 5 Unknown 3 N Dominance test is>50% <br /> __ ___ __ _ _ <br /> 6 Solidago canadensis 3 N FACU Prevalence index is s3.0' '. <br /> - -------_-- <br /> 7 Echinacea purpurea 2 N <br /> 8 _ , Morphogical adaptations'(provide supporting data in <br /> -- -------- _ ___ <br /> 9 ', Remarks or on a separate sheet) <br /> -- -- __ __ ___ _---.__ ---- <br /> ' 10 ' <br /> _ _ <br /> ' 39 =Total Cover Problematic hydrophytic vegetation'(explain) ', <br /> Woody vine stratum (Plot size: ) <br /> . — - --- -��� - 'Indicators of hydric soil ana weUantl hydrology must be present,unless'�, <br /> � 1 disturbed or problematic ''� <br /> , . ..... __... .. ... . ..__ _._._ .__.... ...__. . .. _. . ._.. .... ___.... .. . . ....._. _! <br /> 2 Hydrophytic <br /> 0 =Total Cover vegetation ' <br /> present? N <br /> ',Remarks:(Include phoro numbers here or on a separate sheet) <br /> �._------------_--- — — - --------- -----------------------__--------------------J <br /> US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region <br />