Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 27,1997 <br />• ( #13 - Stubbs Bay Public Lake Access - Continued) <br />Olsen said the City property could be usable if the weeds were contained and would <br />provide incentive for those to use it who wish to. In response to Barrett's comments <br />regarding Minnesota law, Olsen noted that it is common knowledge that the gravel was <br />added in the last five years. Since the gravel was added, traffic has accelerated and <br />caused the slope in the bank. <br />Olsen said she is unaware of where the dock has been located over the last 20 years but <br />feels it was placed arbitrarily. Gappa noted the property was surveyed and staked this <br />summer. Olsen indicated the access is only seasonally used. Olsen said it was her goal <br />to make the property more residential in nature with plantings. <br />Jabbour said it would be possible to document the use of the access back to the <br />beginning of aerial photography. He indicated he has personally used the property <br />himself to gain access. Kelley said he has used the property since 1979 noting the dock <br />is usually located to the left of the trail. Jabbour felt confident the City will be able to <br />show use over the past six years. Jabbour said he would like to solve the issue without <br />having to involve other agencies. <br />Susan Wilson said the Park Commission is in favor of maintaining the access as the <br />community does use it. She noted the access has been an amenity to the community but <br />• she would not like it located on the Olsen property. It was questioned whether access <br />can be totally provided from the existing City property and whether the portion used by <br />the City and owned by the Olsen's can be vacated. <br />Goetten indicated if it is the desire of the Council taking the facts presented by Barrett to <br />continue the use of the property, she would like to be fair to the Olsen's and reach some <br />agreement. She noted the Olsen's understood the property was theirs when it was <br />purchased. <br />Kelley asked Olsen if the title search revealed the use by the public. Olsen said it did <br />not. Kelley said he felt Olsen would have recourse with the title company. <br />Olsen said she does not believe the ownership by the City is established on that parcel. <br />Barrett said if the City uses the property and comes onto her portion of the property, that <br />would be the claim for ownership. He said it appears that the property has been <br />dedicated. Olsen said she then questions the facts. <br />Jabbour asked what it would take to establish the facts for Olsen to be satisfied with <br />ownership by the City. He encouraged Olsen to consider the facts and protect the rest of <br />her property. Jabbour noted he would personally be furious if he lost some of his land, <br />but indicated that the City has their hands somewhat tied as the use has established the <br />is City's right to the property. He voiced concern with involvement by the DNR and a <br />possible request for a designated trail resulting in further loss. <br />15 <br />