My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
10-13-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 4:10:27 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 4:10:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 13,1997 <br />( #9 - #2295 Conley Brooks Jr. - Continued) <br />Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to approve a 12'x12' accessory structure, located 7' from <br />road and meeting the 26' wetland separation, based on hardship of location of house, <br />configuration of lot, and need for convenient and safe place to provide reasonable use of <br />lakeshore. <br />Brooks noted the size was too small. Mitchell suggested a 26'x16' to maintain square <br />footage. Jabbour noted that would be too small for a car but the garage was to be used <br />for storage anyways. Peterson said storage of a car was not the question involved. <br />Mitchell questioned whether the size of the existing structure at 19'x24' could remain. <br />Jabbour noted the Council was split in its decision. He indicated the need to keep the <br />structure off the road and out of the wetland area. He would approve a 12'x15' structure. <br />Jabbour said he is concerned with setting a precedent. <br />Jabbour amended his motion to include a 12'x15' structure with a 12' depth meeting the <br />26' wetland separation. <br />Goetten said she would support that motion if the hardship as stated was not included. <br />Jabbour said he believed there was a strong hardship. <br />• Peterson asked Brooks what the minimum size building could be. Brooks said the <br />minimum would be the largest allowed, suggesting 12'x18'. <br />0 <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Peterson, as she believed a 15'x18' structure should be allowed. <br />( #10) #2298 CONLEY BROOKS, JR., AND JOHN BROOKS, 980 /905 WEST <br />FERNDALE ROAD - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT <br />The applicant and attorney were present. <br />Gaffron reported that the application is a request to detach Lot 13, the peninsula <br />segment, and combine it with Lots A, E, H, and F across the lagoon. The reasoning <br />behind this request is to allow the applicant to have control over the views from his <br />property at 980 West Ferndale. Gaffron showed the relationship between the parcels. <br />The applicant also wants to have control over what happens with the use of this property <br />as it is the most swimmable area and provides extra recreational space. Gaffron noted <br />that if such control is given, there is the possibility that all of the vegetation will be <br />cleared. He noted the Planning Commission recommended approval but with a vote of <br />4:3. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.