My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
10-13-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 4:10:27 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 4:10:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 13,1997 <br />( #9 - #2295 Conley Brooks Jr. - Continued) <br />Mitchell said the applicant would like the eastern portion of the fence to be in front of <br />the tree line. <br />Goetten asked if trees would have to be removed to place the fence. Brooks said some <br />small scrub trees would be removed but none larger than 6" in diameter. Mitchell said <br />the taller trees would remain and shrubbery added. <br />Robert Floyd said he tried planting hedges but people still trespassed and the hedges <br />were flattened by snowplows. Floyd said parking is a problem and vegetation is <br />trampled requiring continuous repair. Floyd said his fence has also been damaged and <br />believes a low fence would not be an impediment. <br />Jabbour asked Floyd how he would feel about seeing a long 6' high fence along the road <br />by the Arcola Bridge. Floyd said the only property affected by the proposed fence <br />would be the Lowry property. They have thick vegetation and no lake view through that <br />section. He feels there is a need to maintain views along CoRd 15 but not in this <br />application. <br />Jerry McCourtney, 1055 Ferndale, said he has lived in his home for 16 years. While he <br />personally is not present during the winter months, he indicated Mr. Skarp kept a close <br />is watch over the area. He feels a fence would be a detriment to those who attempt to enter <br />the area. He indicated he was a victim of a snowmobile robbery and protection is <br />required. <br />0 <br />Jabbour informed him that he disagreed. He did not believe a fence would prevent a <br />snowmobile from entering the property elsewhere if so desired. Jabbour thought <br />boulders would be more of a deterrent. Jabbour said he feels Brooks ability to use his <br />property allows him the right to a fence but not for the purpose of eliminating <br />snowmobilers or fish houses from being moved along the area. Jabbour questioned <br />whether the docks are encroaching the right -of -way. <br />Goetten said she prefers to see open spaces. She is concerned with fencing in the City <br />noting only so many precautions can be taken. <br />Flint was informed that the fence height allowed of 3 -1/2' would apply if the fence was <br />located within the Brooks property as well. Any fence outside the 0 -75' is limited to 3- <br />1/2'. There is nothing allowed in the front yard unless along a County road where 6' <br />fence would be allowed. <br />Jabbour said he would support a 3 -1/2' fence within the right -of -way. <br />I1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.