My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
09-22-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 3:57:33 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 3:57:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />• ( #5 - #2279/ #2280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Goetten asked where the road upgrade would occur. Cook said the existing alignment <br />would be followed and end up on the new right -of -way that is being platted. The same <br />radius would be maintained to retain the distance from the drainfield. <br />Jabbour asked if this would be part of the final subdivision. Gaffron said the resolution <br />states the need for additional right -of -way. He noted the plan being reviewed is a <br />somewhat different plan but would be acceptable with the advisory sign. He questioned <br />whether the City could accept a lower radius standard with the lower speed. <br />John Winston said the neighbors did not want to see a 30 mph zone. He understood the <br />radius would allow for a 25 mph speed but would be posted at 20 mph. <br />Jabbour said he understood the Planning Commission approval would require two <br />Council decisions regarding the road upgrade and sight line improvements for the curve. <br />Winston said the applicant was willing to donate the southeast corner to provide for the <br />road improvement for work within the City property. Work conducted in the past has <br />been done on a participatory basis amongst the neighbors. With two new driveway to the <br />west of the curve at a distance of 217', Winston felt it would be difficult to require the <br />applicant to pay for it. <br />• Winston took the same position regarding widening the road. He said the applicant is <br />willing to pay for his fair share. With only three additional lots, all users should pay an <br />equal amount. <br />Winston noted the Planning Commission recommended the applicant work with Staff on <br />the appropriate screening for the southeast corner of Lot 1. The applicant has conferred <br />with Dundee Nursery. Pictures were shown of the area showing dense brush located in <br />this area. Winston said what is drafted by Staff is more than what the Planning <br />Commission requested. He feels the possible glare from headlights would be deflected by <br />the vegetation and is adequate as it presently exists. Mr. Whitehead said the nursery <br />thought the vegetation that exists is best for the location. <br />Winston noted that Outlot A would provide an additional 20' strip of buffer. He said he <br />agrees with Staff and Planning Commission recommendation except where the applicant's <br />costs are involved. He said the applicant is willing to pay his fair share. <br />Jabbour noted that if the subdivision approval was granted, it would require a variance <br />for the septic system to encroach the road. Gaffron explained that it would be within the <br />setback but not encroach the actual right -of -way. <br />Kelley clarified that the variances were for Lot 3 width and Lot 1 setback. The drainfield <br />is setback would be an administrative setback. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.