Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22.1997 <br />(#6 - #2281 Hennepin County Road 6 Improvements - Continued) • <br />Jabbour reported that the project was originally assigned to a committee made up of Staff <br />and Council. The final design was worked on after that. Jabbour said he is unhavov with <br />the fact that the County had informed those present at that Planning Commission meeting <br />that they would be visited by the real estate people. If there was a holdup with that <br />contact, they should have been notified by letter. <br />Goetten agreed that improved communication is required. <br />Jabbour noted that Jim Grube did meet with neighbors. <br />Moorse asked Theis if there was a brochure regarding right -of -way and the process <br />taken. Theis said the brochure has been available at several meetings. He suggested a <br />mass mailing be done. <br />Theis said bids were being advertised with award in December for a spring start. He felt <br />this schedule should bring about a reaction from the real estate people. <br />Jabbour said the information needs to be communicated to the residents. <br />Kelley moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3968. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays <br />1, Goetten. <br />Jabbour directed Moorse to send a letter to the residents regarding the process. Theis <br />asked that this be coordinated between Moorse and himself. Jabbour supported that <br />request. <br />Flint said he was unclear regarding the monies collected by the MCWD for wetland <br />mitigation being spent in the Citv. Gaffron said he would send a letter to BWSR <br />encouraging them to do projects within Orono. <br />( #7) #2284 JAMES SLECHTA, 3700 NORTHERN AVENUE - VARIANCE <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren distributed photographs of the property. The proposal is for construction <br />of a 42x96 oversized accessory structure on a 3.97 acre parcel. A variance is required <br />as the size exceeds the maximum allowed for an individual accessory structure and the <br />maximum for all accessory structures allowed on the lot. The height of the structure will <br />also exceed the height of the 16' principal structure requiring a variance. The Planning <br />Commission unanimously recommended denial of the application. <br />0 <br />14 <br />