Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 25,1997 <br />• ( * #5) #2255 RICK RICE, 2700 KELLY AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION <br />NO. 3945 <br />Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3945. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays <br />0. <br />(#6) #2264 JANET KIERNAN,1491 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3946 <br />The applicant was present, along with Alan Christy. <br />Gaffron reported that an application for additions to the existing residence was reviewed <br />and approved one year ago, but plans have since been revised. The Planning Commission <br />recently reviewed the application as well. The property located by Bracketts Point was <br />planned for remodeling with additions to the garage. Existing structure and hardcover <br />were reviewed. At the time of applying for the building permit, applicant proposed to <br />remove the entire structure and begin anew with new construction. The plan included <br />encroachment of the side and 75' setback. The Planning Commission had recommended <br />that this new construction should include moving the house back from the 75' setback. <br />The current revised plan will make use of some portion of the existing structure. The <br />applicant will make use of 40% of the existing structure. After the additions, the new <br />• structure will be 80% new and 20% existing. The plan was reviewed with the building <br />inspectors. Gaffron noted that the code does not specify a percentage of existing building <br />that must remain to be considered as a remodeling. <br />The plans include a side setback encroachment. The 75' encroachment will remain as <br />exists. The average lakeshore setback encroachment will change as the nature of the bulk <br />and mass of the structure will increase in that setback. Gaffron indicated that the <br />Planning Commissioners felt this change would not impact the neighboring properties due <br />to its relation to and topography of the land. <br />Staff recommended approval of the application subject to the conditions previously <br />recommended by the Planning Commission. These conditions include no change to the <br />side setback, a change in the driveway, addition of a garage stall, meeting the 15' street <br />setback, and 27.6% hardcover in the 75 -25V setback for a 0.1% increase. <br />The applicant presented a computer scanned photograph of the area depicting what the <br />improvements will look like. Tree coverage was removed to allow the residence to be <br />viewed. However, the actual tree coverage will remain. Alan Christy said no additional <br />encroachment will occur into the setback of the footprint and only in volume for the <br />second story. <br />0 Jabbour was informed that height was not an issue. <br />7 <br />