Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 259 1"7 <br />(Public Comments - Continued) • <br />Jabbour told Hart that a survey would be required and hardcover calculations made for <br />his property for the changes as proposed. He said the Council would be happy to review <br />his application for variance. <br />Goetten apologized to Hart for his having received incorrect information from City Staff. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />(#4) #2238 CHIC DWIGHT AND FRED GUTTORMSON,1220 TONKAWA <br />ROAD - VARIANCES <br />The applicants were present. <br />Gaffron reported that the application is in two parts; one being an after- the -fact lakeshore <br />setback variance and 0 -75' hardcover variance for an enclosed room below the existing <br />deck. The second part includes a 75 -250' hardcover variance for a 32x34' garage. <br />Gaffron explained the location of the property. <br />The deck enclosure was approved two years ago subject to removal of the 8' gravel <br />driveway to the lake and removal of the lakeshore deck. These removals would allow the <br />applicant to enclose below the deck and repair the deck as well as grading for a walkout • <br />doorway. The resolution was not signed and the work was done without the required <br />permits and removals. The work in progress was stopped by the building inspector. <br />This after -the -fact renewal application also now includes a new garage, which would <br />meet the setbacks, and hardcover removal in both the 0 -75' and 75 -250' setback areas and <br />removal of two sheds. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and <br />unanimously recommended approval of the deck enclosure with hardcover removals as <br />noted. The approval is subject to bringing the enclosure into conformance and removal <br />of sheds, 8' driveway and the Lakeshore deck. <br />The Planning Commission determined that the removals suggested by the applicant were <br />insufficient to offset the increase of structural hardcover for the new garage. They <br />requested the loop driveway located in the 0 -75' setback be removed. The applicant did <br />not agree to this removal, and the Planning Commission unanimously recommended <br />denial of this portion of the application request. <br />Guttormson said he installed pop -in, pop -out, type windows without any frost footings <br />under the deck. He also did not do the digging as he had requested or enlarge the deck- <br />He felt he then was not required to make the removals. Jabbour verified that Guttormson <br />screened in what was existing below the deck. Guttormson said Bruce Vang informed <br />him the work must be done to code. It was suggested to him at that time that he split his • <br />application requests into separate parts. <br />4 <br />