07-14-1997 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEE'T'ING HELD ON JULY 14,1997 ( #5 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) . Van Zomeren reported that the application was reviewed at the June 23 Council meeting for the variance and CUP to restore and build an addition to an existing residence located in the 0 -75' setback. A 5.3' side yard setback would require a variance from the I0' requirement. A lakeshore setback variance is required as well as a 0 -75' hardcover variance for 19% hardcover, currently existing at 9%, where none is allowed. The CUP is required to alter land located in the 0 -75' setback. The topography is such that the structure could partially be in the flood plain. Jabbour noted that it is necessary to see the topography and elevation of the property. Van Zomeren agreed that the main issue is the topography of the lot and low elevation. Van Zomeren reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval as noted in the staff memo. Peterson, who along with Kelley was not present at the 6123 meeting, asked Flint his opinion of the applicatiom She indicated she had a understanding of the thoughts of jabbour and Goetten. Gowen said Flint's opinion is similar to her own. Jabbour noted that it had been determined that the application should receive a full Council decision. Peterson brought attention to the discussion regarding the flood plain mitigation. Goetten indicated that she felt the residence could be moved back on the property. Jabbour responded that a move would eliminate a sediment pond that helps the lake and • be a burden to find a new location for good stormwater management for the property owner and Watershed District. Jabbour acknowledged the importance of the 0 -75' setback but felt this was a good example of where an exception could be made. Rahn also indicated that the roof line allows for water directed away from the lake. He also noted that the point was sandy and water ponds in the low lying area. Kelley was informed that the applicant is the current owner of the property. Rahn said he reviewed the ordinance and referenced Section 10.55 regarding flood plain management. It encourages providing storage for runoff and elevating the building site. He said the code also allows for the average lakeshore setback. Peterson said the Council historically does not approve structure in the 0 -75' setback but noted the extenuating circumstances involved in this application. Goetten said the lot is very small and substandard. She agreed that it would be expensive to move the residence out of the 0-75' setback, but said she has never voted for new hardcover in that setback. The applicant responded that the land is highest by the lake and then slopes downward. 0 6