My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
06-23-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 3:41:30 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 3:41:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 23,1997 <br />( #7 - #2240 Tim Waters Sketch Plan - Continued) 9 <br />Waters indicated that sketch plan 4 would require clearing of land which was adverse to <br />the desire of preserving open space and trees. <br />Sketch plan 3 preserves the topography according to Waters with large lots averaging <br />nearly one acre in size, with the flexibility in spacing of the homes on the lots. This plan <br />would allow for undisturbed zones and buffering for the park. Waters feels this plan <br />would provide a high quality development with minimum impact. <br />Waters does not feel that sewering is an issue in the right location. He feels the plan <br />addresses the public health issue noting mound septic systems are damaging to wooded <br />areas due to space needs. Waters said the plan would provide for 19 lots and a right -of- <br />way easement to West Branch Road eliminating the need for the long cul -de -sac on <br />Wiidhurst Trail. <br />Waters said the property could be developed regardless of the issue of rezoning noting <br />the one acre parcels are within the MUSA for sewering and the two acre parcels could <br />remain as such. He felt a better development than this could be gained. He indicated that <br />a change to the MUSA boundary would be modest and be an administrative change. He <br />believes the boundary is atypical at best, and a change would be similar to other <br />modifications to the boundary made in the past and in keeping with the current <br />neighborhood. • <br />Jabbour noted the applicant's sensitivity to the issue of preserving the park area but felt <br />there were more substantial issues with the application. He indicated that the park land <br />did not have to be bisected but could be. He said the main issue is with the sewering of <br />other properties within the City. Jabbour noted that other property owners are also <br />requesting sewer with similar reasons why their properties should be sewered. Jabbour <br />said he would not favor changing City policy to accommodate one applicant. It would be <br />a major change in how the City operates if the policy was driven by one application. He <br />cited the example of the length of time and discussions regarding sewering of the ice <br />arena which was supported by all agencies. Jabbour indicated it is an honorable goal to <br />change the MUSA in order to eliminate bisecting the park land but not if it involves <br />changing City policy. Jabbour asked for Staffs recommendation. <br />Gaon indicated that the City's policy is long standing. He noted that rezoning is rarely <br />considered. Gaffron said he believes in order to develop the property, it would require <br />severing or no development should occur. He noted that other similar requests could <br />occur from properties abutting the hot spots for sewering. He did note the uniqueness of <br />the property and design of the MUSA boundary at this location. <br />Goetten asked how the MUSA boundary was originally determined. Gaffron said it <br />followed the 1975 rezoning. • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.