Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 23, 1997 <br />. 011 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) <br />Van Zomeren reported that the .3 acre property is located in the LR 1B Zoning District. <br />The proposal is to add structure to an existing cabin located within the 0-75' setback. <br />The second story would require a variance to the side yard setback which exists and is <br />proposed at 5.3' and 10' is required. Lakeshore setback variance is required. Average <br />lakeshore setback is not an issue as the structure is located behind that line. A <br />conditional use permit is required for land alteration in the 0-75' setback. Van Zomeren <br />reviewed the topography of the property. The 93T elevation line "wanders" on the <br />property. The existing structure is located at the high point of the property. The flood <br />plain is located behind the structure requiring a CUP for any alteration. <br />The proposal is to square off the structure which encroaches the 0 -75' setback. The <br />hardcover in that setback would increase from 91/6 to 191/6. Van Zomeren indicated the <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of the side setback and hardcover variances <br />noting that improvements are limited to an area behind the existing lakeside setback and <br />an additional half -story. They also recommended approval of the CUP for land <br />alteration. <br />Goetten asked the applicant if he had considered moving the addition to the rear of the <br />structure in order to get out of the 0 -75' setback. <br />. Rahn said he met with the Watershed District. He said his design was an attempt to gain <br />a favorable response from the Council. He indicated that moving the structure back <br />would result in building in the 931.5' elevation which is the flood plain. The plan as <br />presented would not require mitigation of the flood plain as the additions would be built <br />on posts. Rahn said the plan is an attempt to restore the existing structure. He thought <br />the Council would be less receptive to a plan involving alteration of the flood plain. <br />Goetten said her concern is with doubling the hardcover in the 0 -75' setback with any <br />new construction if there are other alternatives to consider. <br />Rahn indicated that only one -third of the new hardcover is livable space; the remainder is <br />decking. He said he tried to keep the structure compact and only squared the structure <br />off. The screen porch and decking is only 8' wide. <br />Goetten asked if Rahn discussed adding to the rear of the structure with the Watershed. <br />Rahn said he did. He met with Jim Hafner of the Watershed District. He said this <br />recommendation is possible but would occur in the lower area of the lot and require <br />major alteration of the flood plain. Rahn said the home is located similarly on the lot with <br />other homes in the neighborhood and is the only unimproved site. <br />13 <br />