Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 27,1997 <br />( #12 - #2235 Martin Schneider - Continued) • <br />Kelley inquired who makes the decision regarding classification. Schneider said El <br />classification allows for occupancy up to 50 children up to grade 12 and E2 allows more <br />than 50. Schneider asked the application be moved forward pending code review and <br />will comply with code. Kelley asked if the classification is determined by Staff. Moorse <br />said the inspection staff reviews it. Kelley asked if this has been done. Van Zomeren said <br />an architect prepares the code compliance, and it is reviewed by Building Official Lyle <br />Oman for completion and appropriateness. Oman performed that review. Moorse noted <br />that the E 1 and E2 classification requires a fire suppression system. He said the change <br />in the building code triggered the need for the fire suppression system but the code <br />compliance has not yet been reviewed. Van Zomeren indicated that this would be <br />conducted by the building official, after an architect had prepared an analysis. <br />Jabbour indicated that the process can be appealed citing an example when the inspector <br />did not agree with the architect's findings. Jabbour reported that Schneider suggested the <br />City's classification of the property before as B2 and now as E2 caused him to lose his <br />grandfather rights. Jabbour clarified for the record and in defense of the City that Staff <br />had made every attempt to get the former occupant in compliance without success. <br />Whether the building is sprinkled is not within the Council's jurisdiction. It is a subject of <br />the building code. Schneider informed Jabbour that he will continue with the process <br />noting he could appeal if necessary. Jabbour and Kelley both noted that regardless of <br />what occurred in the past, the rules regarding children occupying the building have to be • <br />followed. <br />Van Zomeren informed the Council that the prior occupant, the art school, had moved <br />into the building without a certificate of occupancy. The City then had to make attempts <br />to gain compliance over 3 -1/2 years. The B2 classification was for the art center. The <br />Building Official did not observe children on the premises during his inspection. While <br />the past classification may have been incorrect, the classification should be determined <br />before any new use is allowed. Van Zomeren confirmed for Schneider that the building <br />does not have a certificate of occupancy. <br />Schneider reported that he is not affiliated with the art school. He gained possession of <br />the property again when the art school defaulted on their contract for deed in February, <br />1997. <br />Jabbour said the Council would like to expedite and facilitate the application. He <br />indicated that the building can be shown to people prior to receipt of the certificate of <br />occupancy. <br />is <br />16 <br />