My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
05-12-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 3:32:24 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 3:32:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 12t 1997 <br />0 ( #12 - CoRd 19/Tonkaview Drainage Situation - Continued) <br />Bessessen said the direction of the water changed at some point. The area had been dug <br />out. There is currently a 2' culvert. Cook said this currently reflects the flow. <br />Jabbour asked why the stump placed there is not removed. Cook said it works well. <br />Gappa said erosion would occur if it was removed. <br />Kelley asked how much rain the pond would hold. Cook said it would hold a 100 -year <br />storm. The flow would be pushed to the pond which would be 120'x80' and 3' deep. <br />Kelley asked if it would be dry most of the time. Cook estimated the pond would be wet <br />for about two hours after a 100 -year storm. On a five -year storm basis, it would be wet <br />for about one hour. Kelley was informed that it would catch the water flowing down <br />Tonkaview. <br />Kelley asked if it was correct that the housing development caused a change to the water <br />drainage. Cook said some change probably occurred. <br />Jabbour asked if the slope of the County road could be changed. Cook said it would add <br />to the problem. <br />Sawicki said they had hired a hydrologist to study the area, who was conclusive in stating <br />is that the development caused the source of the runoff. Kelley said the housing <br />development is mandated not to cause change to drainage patterns. Kelley questioned <br />whether the residents could be held responsible for causing this change. Jabbour noted <br />that the housing development had received City approval. <br />is <br />Jabbour questioned what effect the ponding would have on the property where it is to be <br />located. He was concerned that it would affect the conformity of the property. Gappa <br />said the property owner was concerned that the pond would affect her garden area. The <br />lot was said to be one acre in size in the one acre zoning. The creation of the pond <br />would deem this property non - conforming. Gappa suggested an easement be taken. <br />Goetten said this would place a burden on the property owner if any improvements were <br />proposed. <br />Jabbour asked about the other cornering property. Bessessen said it was owned by his <br />father -in -law. Jabbour suggested he speak with him regarding using the property for <br />ponding. Bessessen noted that the proposed ponding area had a natural depression. <br />There is also a retaining wall in place that had been erected by Hennepin County. <br />Sawicki said she spoke with the concerned neighbor. She voiced concern with losing <br />control of the property if she granted an easement as well as possible loss of trees and <br />creation of a large pond. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.