Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONG CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 10, 1997 <br />• ( #13 - Telecommunications Policy Statement - Continued) <br />Tom Alexander of Larkin Hoffman Law Firm, Bloomington, was present representing <br />APT, one of the new digital providers. Alexander said he was concerned with the <br />comment in the Staff memo for providing service without additional antennas. He felt <br />this was impossible as the current antennas are being used to capacity by other providers. <br />Alexander indicated that new towers would also be required if no water tower is <br />available. He noted it would be less expensive to use existing structures as new towers <br />cost up to $150,000 to build. <br />Alexander explained how the locations for antennas are determined. It is based on a grid <br />system working outward from the core of the metro in a honeycomb fashion. Expansion <br />location cannot be determined until the service is built outward. There is a limited ability <br />to move more than 500' from what is determined to be an ideal spot. Alexander said <br />there would be no guarantee that a water tower would meet that ideal spot. <br />Alexander said the ordinance as drafted allowed antenna placement only on the two water <br />towers. He indicated these locations may not meet the radio frequency requirements and <br />would be in violation of the Federal Telecommunications Act. Alexander reported that <br />the criteria his company looks for in building towers includes the following: 1) radio <br />frequency (coverage requirement), 2) whether the property owner is open to a lease, 3) <br />• zoning, and 4) whether the location is buildable. <br />Alexander asked the Council if they were willing to commit to a hierarchy of incentive <br />regarding allowing antennas as a permitted use on water towers and identifying other <br />preferred zoning districts, which would be in his opinion a lesser but significant <br />restriction. Alexander said he would respectively object to the restrictions to the towers <br />and asked for flexibility. <br />Jabbour asked what the range is of the PCS service. Alexander said the technology is <br />based on line of sight. Antennas are required every 2 to 4 miles in rural areas and every <br />1/2 mile in dense areas with heavy use. <br />Jabbour said he was concerned with the language of the letter sent by Alexander stating <br />the City would have to allow antennas wherever they were necessary and at random . <br />locations. Alexander said the antenna locations would be subject to zoning requirements <br />of the City. <br />Radio noted the immaturity of the industry. While the industry will look at the City's <br />zoning laws regarding prohibiting antennas and towers, they have not yet reached that <br />point. Radio said the City must accommodate the antennas but cannot overrule the <br />zoning laws. He suggested the City be proactive by informing the industry what can or <br />• cannot be done within the City and let the companies plan accordingly. He noted that the <br />grid locations have not yet been determined. <br />19 <br />